skinfan2k Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 it is 9 because vegas wants to make people put their money on the hawks after the skins offense showed up to do nothing. It was against the #1 d. seahawks d has given up pts this year. vegas knows what they want to do to make money. they know the skins d can keep them in this game cuz the majority of the country will take the #1 over a 6 anytime. with a 2 week break. But tell me this when has holmgren or hasselback won a big game against a good team. Vegas also saw that Gibbs is 36-5 on a short week. Many betters forget that springs is also coming back next week. The high spread is to help bets for the seahawks. f the seahawks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 The search function is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 It's also great for those of us that bet on the Skins.............since we'll win outright! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 9, 2006 Author Share Posted January 9, 2006 of course it is.. but i want guys like betters for the skins to know this and i thikn this is very important for people to know why the spread is -9. i simply think that a reply would not be as effective to reach the public of the message board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oriolesfan93p Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 But tell me this when has holmgren or hasselback won a big game against a good team. Holmgren coached the Packers to 2 consecutive superbowls, winning one of them, you can't deny that. No team that makes it all the way to the Superbowl is a bad team, and the Superbowl is a very big game. I have no doubt that we whip the Hawks this saturday, but don't make yourself and everyone else here out to be a moron with posts like that. now as for the hasselback part, I am with you there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted January 9, 2006 Author Share Posted January 9, 2006 holmgren won big games years ago, when favre was in his prime. honestly he has not won any playoff games since and without him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misery Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 we will win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 We'll take the ball and we're gonna score! - Matt Hasselbeck :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 Holmgren coached the Packers to 2 consecutive superbowls, winning one of them, you can't deny that. No team that makes it all the way to the Superbowl is a bad team, and the Superbowl is a very big game.I have no doubt that we whip the Hawks this saturday, but don't make yourself and everyone else here out to be a moron with posts like that. now as for the hasselback part, I am with you there. pot meet kettle, thinking we are going to whip them is as dumb as the other post as for vegas, they don't lose money, we are 9 down because of the seatle's perfect home record, and the teams that do have the week off have a huge advantage on the other teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.