skinsfan00atg Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 WASHINGTON REDSKINS Pos Player INJ YRDs*TDs*PTs Comments RB Clinton Portis 0/140/20 0/1/0 22 Break out game against overmatched Seattle front four The strength of Seattle's front seven is its interior so expect Portis and Washington's mauling offensive line to attack the perimeters of the Seahawks' run defense. Redskins' tackles Jon Jansen and Chris Samuels should overwhelm Seattle's ends, seal the edges and give Portis clear outside running lanes. This is the game Portis breaks out. [/url] WR Santana Moss 0/0/65 0/0/1 12 Big play potential realized against mistake-prone Seattle secondary Washington's mammoth offensive line should open holes for Clinton Portis which will force the Seahawks' safeties to play more in run support. Seattle's cornerbacks are talented but inexperienced and mistake-prone in coverage. Moss won't rack up the yardage in Washington's conservative offense but his big play potential could be a factor if Seattle's raw cornerbacks drop the ball. QB Mark Brunell 190/0/0 1/0/0 11 Running game takes center stage, Brunell gets limited shots Washington's offense is centered on Clinton Portis, who should have success running against Seattle's undersized front four. As Portis pick up yardage, Seattle will move its safeties up to help in run support, leaving its young and mistake-prone cornerbacks to fend for themselves. Though Brunell won't take many downfield shots, he should find success working against Seattle's inexperienced cornerbacks off of play-action. WR David Patten 0/0/45 0/0/0 4 Run-heavy Washington offense offers limited chances Patten's speed always makes him a threat after the catch, particularly against Seattle's mistake-prone secondary, but in Washington's run-heavy attack, Mark Brunell's throws and Patten's fantasy impact will be limited. D/ST Redskins D/ST 0/0/0 0/0/0 4 Seattle's offensive line and Alexander keep Redskins from turnovers The Redskins' defense is highly aggressive and will blitz Matt Hasselbeck at every opportunity. However, Seattle's offensive line has done an excellent job of protecting Hasselbeck all season and should give their quarterback time to make quick throws. The Seahawks will also limit Washington's defensive impact by giving Shaun Alexander 25+ carries. With the Seahawks offering Washington few turnover opportunities, the Redskins' defense will have an off week. K John Hall 0/0/0 0/0/0 3 May not be 100% even if he plays Hall (quadriceps) missed the Redskins' last game (Week 2) but may play against the Seahawks. However, even if Hall does play, he still may not be 100% and his effectiveness is highly questionable. If Hall can't play, rookie Nick Novak will be the kicker. TE Chris Cooley 0/0/25 0/0/0 2 H-back doesn't have size to be redzone threat Washington's passing attack will take a backseat to Clinton Portis and the Redskins' running game. Cooley is a versatile H-back and will be lined up all over the field but he lacks the size to be an effective redzone receiver and will have a minimal fantasy impact. WR James Thrash 0/0/15 0/0/0 1 On sidelines as Washington focuses on running game As Washington's third receiver, Thrash only gets on the field when Joe Gibbs goes to multiple receiver threats. With the Redskins committed to getting Clinton Portis going, look for Washington to go with more two tight end sets, leaving Thrash on the sideline. RB Ladell Betts 0/15/5 0/0/0 1 Portis' backup not a factor Betts will give Clinton Portis a breather. But Betts is strictly a backup and will be lucky to get more than 5-carries. TE Robert Royal 0/0/10 0/0/0 1 Blocking for Portis his only role Royal is a better blocker than H-back Chris Cooley and should see time when Washington goes to its two tight end sets. However, though he may prove critical helping to seal the edge for Clinton Portis, Royal won't be a factor in the passing game. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS Pos Player INJ YRDs*TDs*PTs Comments K Josh Brown 0/0/0 0/0/0 17 Good chance to shine against solid Washington defense Seattle's offense is capable of moving the ball but Washington's defense is very good in the redzone. Brown could be a major player as Seattle is forced to settle for field goals. QB Matt Hasselbeck P230/10/0 0/1/0 14 No time for downfield throws against Redskins' blitzes Washington's defense may lack elite shutdown corners but Gregg Williams' super-aggressive defense will make it very difficult for Hasselbeck to make downfield throws. The Redskins bring pass-rushers and blitzers from all over the field which will force Hasselbeck into quick, short-yardage throws and limit his receivers' big play potential. RB Shaun Alexander 0/95/20 0/0/0 11 Lower your expectations against stout Redskins' run defense Alexander (140-yds., 4-td's) is coming off a monster game last week against the Cardinals but running against Gregg Williams' Redskins' defense is a whole different story. Washington brings blitzers on almost every down which forces opposing offensive lines to make presnap adjustments. FedEx Field gets loud which could lead to some missed assignments and allow the Redskins to flow unobstructed to Alexander. Dial back your expectations for Alexander this week. WR Darrell Jackson 0/0/75 0/0/0 7 Short yardage receptions limit big play possibilities Washington's frequent blitzes will put the dampers on Seattle's downfield passing game. However, Seattle's offensive line does a solid job pass-blocking and should give Matt Hasselbeck the time he needs to make quick, short-to-intermediate throws. Jackson should be a frequent target but he'll struggle picking up yards after the catch against the Redskins' gang-tackling defense. WR Bobby Engram 0/0/60 0/0/0 6 Receptions, yes. Touchdowns and yardage, no. Engram has emerged as a solid second receiver for the Seahawks. With Matt Hasselbeck forced to make quicker, shorter throws against Washington's pass rush, expect the consistent Engram to be a frequent target. But while he'll rack up the receptions in traffic, don't expect any big plays from Engram. D/ST Seahawks D/ST 0/0/0 0/0/0 5 Conservative Redskins' offense minimizes mistakes Washington's offense is centered on the running of Clinton Portis, who should get close to 30 carries. With Mark Brunell and the passing game playing it close to the vest, the Seahawks' defense may struggle to take advantage of a Washington offensive line that has had problems all season protecting its quarterback. TE Jerramy Stevens 0/0/40 0/0/0 4 Big target offers Hasselbeck a safety valve Stevens is a monster physically- 6'7", 265 pounds- and has emerged as a reliable receiving option for Matt Hasselbeck. Washington's defense brings almost nonstop pressure which will force Hasselbeck to get rid of the ball quickly. Expect his mammoth tight end to haul in a few passes. WR Joe Jurevicius 0/0/15 0/0/0 1 Too slow off the line to help Hasselbeck Seattle will try and spread out Washington's secondary with frequent multiple receiver sets. However, Matt Hasselbeck will have to make quick throws against Washington's frequent blitzes. Jurevicius lacks quickness, does not get good releases and will struggle to adjust to Hasselbeck's quicker throws. TE Itula Mili O0/0/0 0/0/0 0 Unlikely to have impact if he can play Mili (abdomen) has yet to play this season. His status for this week's game against the Redskins is questionable. However, even if he is healthy enough to play, Mili's production will be limited by the presence of starting TE Jerramy Stevens and Seattle's frequent multiple receiver sets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 "FedEx Field gets loud which could lead to some missed assignments and allow the Redskins to flow unobstructed to Alexander. Dial back your expectations for Alexander this week." --Make a note Redskins fans do make an impact and people are noticing. FedEx can become a hard place for opponets to play if we keep it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbill Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Another note on the noise level at FEDEX. Imagine that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan00atg Posted September 28, 2005 Author Share Posted September 28, 2005 I know, a lot of people who havent been here think Fedex is loud cause it's the biggest stadium, but they don't know it's not nearly as loud as it could be, because no one a) gets their on time or gets loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airborneskins Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Boy talk about a jinx.. I hope that we are ready to play on Sunday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTillIDie Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Based on this note, it seems that we overpower them on both sides of the ball. It'll be ugly like usual, but it looks like we can enter week 5 undefeated... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 The Redskins line is getting a rap for not protecting but the conditions last Monday lead to the 300 pounders getting worn down. The fact is the conditions will be better on Sunday for the big uglies and the Redskins run game would seem to be a little too physical for the Seahawks more finesse defense. The key to this game is to be physical on both sides of the ball. The defense will have to be physical to limit Alexander and get pressure on Hasselbeck. The offense will have to be physical to create openings for Portis and sustaining longer drives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuck Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Didn't Cooley score a bunch of touchdowns last year? I'd think that would make him a red zone threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins1972 Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Why is that always one person brings up a freaking jinx talk when we are given some props? Geezus man, maybe you are the one jinxing the team!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamshatterer Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I know, a lot of people who havent been here think Fedex is loud cause it's the biggest stadium, but they don't know it's not nearly as loud as it could be, because no one a) gets their on time or gets loud. I agree with this statement 100%!!! FedEx has become a "family outing with families that have a lot of money". It's not a freakin baseball game where you talk about your damn dogs or cats during plays, get loud and proud and cheer the team or get the phuk out and give another fan who will get up and scream a chance to get to the game!!! :tantrum: Whew, I'm done now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0crates Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I Love This Thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sumodat Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I know, a lot of people who havent been here think Fedex is loud cause it's the biggest stadium, but they don't know it's not nearly as loud as it could be, because no one a) gets their on time or gets loud. c) The 'Skins haven't given us reason to. Now, they are giving us reason to and we are reacting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 After reading this I am thoroughly convinced that Patten, Cooley & Royal will all have touchdowns in this game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVCChairman Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 "The Redskins mammoth offensive line..." that's what it's all about right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 This game is by no means a lock.. We'll have to bust ass to win this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.