Forever A Redskin

Like I said. At minimum it's debatable. Still the lie of "multiple police officers died" is, a lie. You still haven't addressed my other noteworthy items of doctored evidence presented by the committee. Or the simple fact that only 16 percent of polled Americans even care about the outcome of this dog and pony show.

At least you're willing to admit that nothing will come from this committee. I also posted links of direct tweets from a lawyer, and articles from CNN, NPR, and MSN.com. besides, I don't call out anyone or claim their posts are BS for citing "left-wing" sources. It's all to support our individual opinions, no? Unless there is a list of approved websites we are allowed to post from, or is it just unspoken mob-rule? I figured CNN and NPR were pretty neutral. I'll try harder next time. Roseanne Boyland.

Who's the one spreading lies here? Directly from CNN: Washington(CNN)The Justice Department on Tuesday abandoned the idea that pro-Trump rioters had used bear spray against US Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick during the January 6 riot, a major change after implying for weeks that bear spray, not pepper spray, had been deployed. Prosecutors addressed the seemingly small but significant difference at a detention hearing for the two men charged in connection with the chemical attack. All sides now acknowledge that the defendants, Julian Khater and George Tanios, brought bear repellant to the Capitol and that Khater asked for it just moments before the attack but ended up using pepper spray instead. The clarification came a week after Washington's chief medical examiner ruled that Sicknick had suffered strokes and died of natural causes a day after the attack. The finding undercut theories that an allergic reaction to the chemical spray may have led to his death. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/04/27/politics/sicknick-capitol-bear-spray-pepper/index.html At minimum, it's debatable. But doesn't change the fact that the lie of "multiple police officers lost their lives" is in fact, a lie. If simple pepper spray caused strokes all the time, it wouldn't be deployed by law enforcement as less-lethal crowd control all the time. You're reaching. I'm assuming this means some sort of censorship or ban towards me? If so, I'd like to know why.

No, I'm not. And the top two Google results say otherwise: How much more proof do I need to post? Your standard tactics are to take a post of mine with tons of evidence, find the one part of it you can find an article stating the contrary... And proceed to label the whole post a lie. That's not how that works. Do you care to respond to the other parts of my post regarding the edited and doctored evidence your beloved committee is presenting to the public? You can try to write me off as a liar all you want, won't make the impending defeat of this fake committee any different. How inclusive of you. And the right are the extremists?

I'm not a troll, I'm posting facts. But I know as soon as I start making legitimate arguments and evidence proving my statements that the American people don't care about this, and that it will amount to nothing... People on here will start muting me and flagging my posts (naturally). I disrupt the echo-chamber. Just write me off as a wacko "conspiracy theorist" if you want. The polls and data show that more people feel the way I do than there are people that care about this political sideshow. What part of what I posted just now is conspiracy? And the right are the extremists? Do you also wish that the attempted murder on Justice Kavanaugh was successful? Bold statements coming from the party of "inclusivity". Seems you're appalled by violence and condemn violence unless it's committed on your political opponents. Yuck.

During the evening’s most popular time slots, ABC, NBC and CBC took major hits, as very few people tuned in for the night’s propaganda theater. According to Cable News Watch, only 4.5 million people watched the hearing on ABC, while NBC and CBC only got roughly three million viewers. The Hill’s Joe Concha said that on an average night the networks normally get about 20 millions viewers combined, Thursday night’s fiasco reeled in only 11 million. Meanwhile, a recent Scott Rasmussen National Survey found that only 16 percent of Americans are following the hearing “very closely.” The poll also found that almost half of voters, 42 percent, want to “install President Trump as the nation’s permanent leader.”

We must stop disinformation! Unless it comes from us!

Not to mention, the only police officer that died, died a day later... From unrelated causes. Brian Sicknick (had two strokes). Meanwhile, multiple trump supporters were shot and killed that day.... Better edit that part out though. Wouldn't want the American Public to see that part. Imagine the outcry if a BLM supporter was killed by police and they edited that part out of the footage.

Jan. 6 committee admits to altering text message between Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jan-6-committee-admits-to-altering-text-message-between-mark-meadows-and-jim-jordan/ar-AARQzZt Also, Liz Cheney only read an excerpt of trump's tweet and didnt finish it. The part where he said "go home with love and peace" Committee is going great. Exactly what the public views it as. A partisan smear campaign masquerading as a "trial" for cameras. Except for there is no evidence. And the evidence they do have is doctored and altered... Which, in fact, is not evidence. If a prosecutor omitted portions of evidence in a trial with intent to mislead they would be disbarred. This is a JOKE. What kind of legal hearing needs to hire a publicity expert/expert producer/storyteller? It's a kangaroo court folks. But you guys keep hanging on every word. THIS IS GONNA BE THE ONE GUYZ! WEVE GOT HIM! TRUMP IS REALLY GOING DOWN THIS TIME! Like I said from the beginning, this will be a nothing-burger... And the public will only be even more mad that this is what their tax dollars are paying for, instead of politicians working on things that they care about. Carry on.

Because you've watched any of his content, right?

It's cool man, you dont have to respect me. I respect your opinion I never tried to compare the two riots. They are different with two different sets of circumstances. If you can't admit that 6 billion dollars worth of damage, 12 deaths, and hundreds of injuries isn't terrible and shouldn't be brushed under the rug... I don't think we will ever see eye to eye anyway. Both can be terrible. Two things can be true.

People trying to silence someone usually means they are afraid of what they are saying. All he does is report on the stuff that the mainstream media won't. Its sad it enrages people to the extent that it does. Same type of people that want to kill Justice Kavanaugh over Roe V. Wade. Tonight's episode is fantastic.

No I buy two new ones each season. Obviously the customizing has only been necessary the past few years.

Doesn't stream from his basement. He has a secure compound in western Maryland. He's had 10 swattings in the past year and just had his last stream interrupted by a bomb threat. Not quite the basement lurker you make him out to be. He's doing something right to be the target of that much hate.

Yeah I do. Of my two favorite players I'm rooting for that year. I have Redskins jerseys customized with current player names.

Do you know how many times "fight" has been used by politicians? It's pretty common. Thinking that those words are proof that he directed people to storm the capital is a little silly if you ask me.

I recommend checking out his live streams. He's had some pretty awesome guests on his show. He has Andy Ngo on tonight. Convo is always good and thought provoking. He's not the only source I use for news, just the most prominent name. I agree on divisive media.

I'm not certain that Juste won't steal a starting outside CB spot. Can WJ3 play slot? We already know Fuller is better outside. But word from OTAs was that WJ3 hasn't looked so hot. If he continues to struggle, I hope JDR experiments with Jackson at slot and Juice on the outside, opposite Fuller.

I believe his exact words were "PEACEFULLY March to the capitol"

So they should be investigating those officers as part of this committee correct? If you guys are right and this was all a big plot to overthrow the election, they've had a year and a half to gather the evidence to prove it.

Yeah, just cherry pick things out of my posts. Demand that I respond to something, and if I don't... All other points I made are invalid? I haven't seen enough to prove the national guard thing. Amber heard said a lot of things under threat of perjury as well. I'm more than capable of admitting when I'm wrong. If you don't want to have a conversation with me, you guys are doing a terrible job of it. Every time I post I get bombarded by everyone simultaneously... And that seems to be a theme of anyone who posts anything conservative or anti-left here. You gang up on people until you either chase them out of the forum or get them banned. For the sake of conversation, I admit I was wrong about Pelosi. I don't know who turned down the national guard. Happy? My questions still stand and are still valid. Why was security so insufficient for Jan 6th despite having Intel? Why did capitol police wave people in? If it's a comprehensive investigation, it should be investigating more than just Trump, correct (because that's all the first night of the committee was about) Do you believe January 6th would have happened if security was adequate? How can we keep this from happening? I think all riots are bad. People that partake in them should suffer the consequences. Do you believe that too? Can we reach hands across the aisle and condemn rioting regardless of cause? I will continue to post my opinions respectfully. The pendulum is swinging back the other way, and people are freaking out. I'm here for it.

So incoming recession, record inflation, record gas prices, a botched exit from Afghanistan that left US soldiers behind and millions of dollars of weapons behind, and a President that has the nerve to get on TV and say the only problem is a messaging problem isn't bad enough for you? Tell me the great things the Democrats have done that don't include the word Trump in it, and doesn't include job numbers after record unemployment due to covid. I'd love to hear what you feel is going well right now. I accept that I was wrong about the existence of a thread on how to fix the Democratic party. It wasn't on the front page, so I didn't see it.

I think the rioters and the people who stormed the capital should be charged if they took part in it. I don't think the goal of the majority of people going there was to overthrow the government. I'm sure a select few nutjobs believed they could. I've never acted like it wasn't a big deal. I think the election results were legitimate. I think there were dirty games being played, but that's modern politics. I also think people have Biden voter regret and can't wait to get him back out of office.

So what do you call people like me who aren't pro trump, but are pro-anyone but a current leftist democrat? Am I a racist too? There's a lot of people like me out there. For people that hate him, you guys sure love talking about the guy. All I see are threads dunking on Republicans, immediately making Elon musk an enemy... Not a single thread on the problems of the Democratic party.

So you believe that all Republicans are racist? That's a hot take. I didn't admit I was wrong on anything. I believe Trump suggested the national guard and it was refused by SOMEONE. I don't care who it was. Pelosi, Bowser, A English bulldog. No one has responded to my questions of why the capitol police were at 50% and why they let people in and waved them through the gates. No one can even admit that security was insufficient and that this could have been prevented with better security. Someone is at fault for that, and it's not the guy who suggested the national guard.