gooseneck

So you say you want an offensive line draft.

Along with 2 firsts and a second in 2025 R1 BUF R1 MIN R1 R2 BUF R2 R4 R5 R6 R7

that is a much more solid argument. As someone who has done "Amicus Curiae" briefs in the United States Supreme Court "Farmer v. Brennan", Death penalty cases State v. Shepard. and cases won in the Montana Supreme Court "State v. Kaufman", I do not think my view was unsound. I agree with you; he was a huge waste of money, and I doubt he will be very good. However, I think showing other players that a person will have a chance to compete after a down year in a bad position for him is not a bad example. I think it shows a non-stupid loyalty; If he shows nothing but being an adequate backup up, we will cut him when it makes financial sense. Well, I am done with this topic. I am sorry I upset so many of you. I never thought I would say this but. "GO PATRIOTS"

Interested how you find it unsound. Is this something you feel or is there any logic behind it. It would not be the first time an out of position player came back and did a respectable job. I think it would be a horrible example to make a rash decision because everyone is irritated at this dysfunctional season. Bring him back, let him compete.

Unless Wylie is a cancer in the locker room we should bring him back. We lose all the money. anyway. Even if he was an adequate back up, it makes sense.

I love that scenario. Think of what San Francisco traded for a Quarterback. Remember. New regime. We might be able to fill a few holes on the offensive line through free agency. I do not see much out there, but there are a few guards and who knows. If we get a RT we can shift Wylie to guard where he might be somewhat adequate.

This is what I think we should do. Build offensive line and wide receiver in free agency and the draft. Trade draft picks for next year. Save cap room. If Howell does good with his weapons, the next year we can go all out spending on our defense and drafting defensive players. If he does not do good, we will be in a position to draft a Quarterback.

Jets game is our Super Bowl of the draft. Could be a 0 to 0 tie. I wonder what the ratings will be like.

what is the record for scoring more than 60 points in games in a season?

Able to snip and cut but could not get all the draft on. Still working on it-My problem is it seems like different sites are all over the board on ratings- for instance on this draft I picked Trotter at 71 as he was rated no. 74. Elsewhere, he is rated as high as 20. I liked Kiper; I remember when he had Brian Urlacher rated no. 7 and no one else had him going before the fourth round until they saw Kiper's rating.

I didn't see any film or him raising his hand and giving the right answer in class.

I predict this team will be better at winning the off season than Bruce Allen's teams.

I think that would line our game up with the Rams as a key game. Things are getting exciting. Posted before- key game with Rams coming up if Zona wins

I just do not want to pick OT with a top 10 pick unless they are very likely a sure thing at LT. Especially, with some very good offensive tackles later in the draft.

Well, you all got me soured on Alt. If we cannot get a dominant left tackle with our first pick, I am for trading down and getting 2 picks in the 15-20 range for Edge and good LT. That would probably leave us with 2 seconds, a good Edge, a good Tackle and some flexibility in the second round. However, if in Free agency we can significantly improve our offensive line I could definitely go for the dominant weapon for Howell route. Commanders' Rooting Guide for 2024 NFL Draft Implications of Week 12 | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors | Bleacher Report https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10098481-commanders-rooting-guide-for-2024-nfl-draft-implications-of-week-12

Can they hire a Pee Wee coach now to coach our secondary?

Jerry Jones makes more stupid comments than we have points.

NFL Draft Trade Value Chart | Over the Cap Using this trade value chart if we trade down from 7 we equal about two no. 16 picks if we trade up from Chicago's pick- that leaves us our 2nd and 2 third round choices. We Could go Edge, OT- and then best values linebacker and more offensive line in our next 3 picks.

Using the stupid mock simulators, It seems like if we trade down to 15-20 with the no. 7 pick and trade up to 15-20 with the Chicago's 2nd round pick and draft choices, we get from trading down we can get a very good Edge and a very good OT, and still have several prime draft picks left over for linebacker and a few other positions.

Is Henry getting a penalty for unnecessary roughness on a football for batting it?

This would be one of our best losses ever. We move up in the draft and Chicago moves up in the draft and New York might not get a franchise QB. Giants 3 sack fumble gained returned for touchdowns; New York 21 Commanders 20.

I think we have high needs at Edge, Offensive line, WR, Running back, Tight End, Linebacker and Cornerback. Looking at our draft history we should trade our first and second rounders for multiple picks 3-7.

I did not think we could make the playoffs with a 6 and 11 record.