London Kev

That is awesome. "Oh the unfathomable horror, Miami score a touchdown" that made me literally lol. Do you have a link, I'd like to check out this guy's other vids, or was it just a one-off?

Two in a row? That's a big, fat no. The most I see us scoring is two TD's and two FG's. The Niners could easily get three of each. 49ers - 30 Redskins - 20

I was expecting the worst from Flowers, but he's turned out to be surprisingly good. It's starting to look like a smart move to start him at guard. Penn had some big shoes to fill and he's doing well so far. There's still something wrong with our run-blocking. It looked better against the inept Dolphins, but it was far from a convincing display.

I prefer the win over the pursuit of better draft picks, but that wasn't a good win. There's no way that Allen can gloat his way out of this one. We're not close. We're not even close to being close. Snyder must be able to see that, can't he? So, yeah, I'm glad we won, but I'm far from happy. This actually feels like after that draw to Cincinnati in London, all a bit empty.

Here you go. https://www.redskins.com/video/bill-callahan-on-case-keenum-he-prepares-like-no-quarterback-i-ve-seen

Well yeah, technically it can happen, but I wouldn't bet on it. Even if we had a 50% chance to win each game (which is way too high IMO), then the chance of us winning all eleven games is a little under 0.05%. Not impossible, but highly unlikely (but you knew that anyway).

I was going to post something like this, but this said it better. I just want to reiterate the last sentence. "Why is Bruce really here???" like really, WHY IS BRUCE REALLY HERE???

Sorry Santana , I've edited it. Thankfully I've never made the same mistake IRL.

Fish tank the bowl. Skins 24 Fins 10

All good points and I agree with you. I was more making the point that the concept is a sound one and not just for the big shoulders of the 1980's. Are we ready to make the transition right now? Probably not, but I wouldn't mind it if we gave it a go. I mean what have we got to lose?

I see a lot of ridicule regarding the idea of becoming a running team, but did anyone see the Colts game yesterday? They rushed 45 times for 180 yards, controlled the clock (37:15) and beat a very good Chiefs team, all with Jacoby Brissett (a 3rd round pick) at QB. Admittedly they've invested three first-round draft picks in the O-Line, but a run-heavy approach can be successful, even in today's NFL.

What this guy girl said.

Yeah, he made a point of saying that we need to get the run game going and be more run orientated. He stated that it will feature AP and CT and we need to run it 25-30 times a game (kind of implying that Jay got away from the run game too early). I like that O'Connell is getting a chance at play calling.

Fair enough. I'm also more inclined to believe Russini, but I think that my point still stands.