AsburySkinsFan

It is, and the bottle is nearly 2 pints, only lacking 3 fl oz, so there's enough to share...not sure why anyone would actually do that though. The Young's is really good, and what I noticed was that as I worked through the bottle it seemed to bring out differences in flavor and smell, either that or the 5.2% abv was getting to me.

LoL! Adds balance right.

I was talking with a beer expert the other day on beeradvocate.com about this very thing with Guinness, it felt thin in my mouth almost like a "light" stout if there were such a thing. He explained to me that Guinness Draught is a "Dry Irish Stout" and as such it fits the description perfectly. I think I made a mistake by missing that the Guinness Draught was in the same category as other stouts, but I guess its in a sub-category. Other than that, I'm wondering what group I'm gonna try out next week, so many to choose from.

First, wow, I think I would save this 'til last so I can savor it all night long, or do you get it first because later your buds are worn out?

Young's Double Chocolate Stout A+ / 4.65 look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | drink: 4.5 1 pint .09 US fl.oz Room temp bottle (large glass) Appearance: the pour was average though for the size of the bottle it created a chug as it poured which really built the head up, easily I would say 3 fingers, with still more in the bottle. The head was almond colored and had a medium density, but dissipated to a ring by the time I took my first sip. The head has a light cling to the glass, but I noticed some heavier spots near the top where the head reached but the brew itself did not. The stout is ink black in the glass, though you can see just a hint of clean dark amber on the bottom of the glass when held to the light, other than that it is beautifully opaque with zero light showing through the middle of the brew. I can see very little evidence of carbonation on the top. Just looking at it I'm intrigued. Smell: One of the first things that I noticed other than just how excellent this smelled was the toffee or caramel sweetness and the noticeable alcohol aroma, this had a heavy underlayer of dark malts what I can only imagine are chocolate malts, I also smell a bit of spicyness not nearly as prominent as the Bison Chocolate Stout. In other brews I've smelled hints of sweetness, but here it is especially prominent; as I continued to drink I began to recognize a building in the sweetness and a lessening of the alcohol smell, that with the malt base really had my nose going. Taste: Sweet toffee right away as it hits my tongue, but not candy bar toffee more of a refined flavor, this mixed with the malts is excellent. I'm a big espresso lover and the deep rich flavors light my taste buds up, as does Young's stout, combine that with the well balanced level of hops with the deep cacao weaving through it all and the taste is simply the best I've experienced. There was some alcohol taste at first, but the more I drank the more it seemed to diminish. The finish has a nice bite from the hops reminding you after all that you are drinking a stout, but then the malts and chocolates remain and flood up your nose giving you an after-taste you don't want to lose. Young's stout is a very robust full bodied brew that will honestly leave you wishing there was more in that oversized bottle. Mouthfeel: The stout is thick on the tongue and in the mouth it rolls well and has a bit of effervescence from the carbonation but it does not make the brew foamy. If anyone accuses this brew of being watery then they must drink their brews with a spoon, the thing that I noticed most is that the feeling is much thicker in my mouth than it looks. I did notice a light buttery taste and film in my mouth afterwards from the diacetyl (stuff that makes butter feel like it does), but it was not heavy or unpleasant. Drinkability: Well what can I say, other than I was three fourths of the way through before I decided to slow down and sip the last bit savoring the flavors. This is a dessert beer, I can see drinking this on special occasions or when fine dining with a rich meal, or simply enjoying a bottle during a night with friends. The size of the bottle, alcohol content 5.2% abv and the robust flavors keeps this from being a session beer, but if what you want is a brew to settle down with and work with while letting your senses run wild then pour yourself a Young's. This by far is the best stout I've had to date and I simply find it hard to believe that it gets better. On my next stop though the liquor store I'll be picking up another for a nice quiet night home.

Tonight's sampling Bison Organic Chocolate Stout B / 3.7 look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | drink: 4 Bottle Slightly cooler than room temp Appearance: this brew has a smooth pour and builds an almond colored head quickly to about 1 finger which begins to fade to a thin layer within a minute or so, the head has a medium froth nowhere near as dense as the Guinness nitro-bottle; the head also slides off leaving no lacing on the glass The brew itself is near black, but on the edges and bottom you can see that it is a very deep amber, especially when held to the light. It is a clear liquid, and I could see some evidence of carbonation with a single bubble stream visible on the surface. There was nothing really extra ordinary about the appearance, and the fact that it was not opaque reminded me of the Guinness, but this was even clearer. It looked good, but really just seemed average to me. Smell: I hold my breath as I put my nose in the glass before inhaling, and even then I could feel the bite of the bitterness in my nostrils which really made me think I was in for a very hoppy brew. As I inhaled the spice was indeed prominent, and there was thick dark malt that you would expect from a stout. I could also smell some sweetness like toffee, but I was really left searching for any chocolate aroma. Taste: The spice is certainly in this brew but not nearly as strong as I was expecting from the aroma, as I am not one who likes an overly hoppy brew I was pleasantly surprised at the difference between the aroma and the initial taste. Continuing with the first pull I tasted the heavy malts that should not come as a surprise when drinking stouts, this was followed by the bite of bitterness at the finish that was sharper than the Guinness, I really only noticed the chocolate at the end and it seemed a very rich dark chocolate. As I continued to explore the tastes I concentrated on the sweetness which is there on the tip of the tongue but certainly not a primary flavor. This did not taste at all watered down. Mouthfeel: The Chocolate Stout is a thicker feeling brew than Guinness but certainly not syrupy by any stretch. I did notice any creaminess although there was a thin buttery coating in my mouth after swallowing. One thing that I noticed early was the carbonation, I expected to feel this from the appearance and I was afraid that it might be overbearing but that was not to be, the carbonation fizzed on my tongue some but it was not distracting from the flavors. Drinkability: This is a good drinking brew, but the carbonation hangs in the stomach more than others and causes some bloating, the liquid itself is not all that heavy but with the carbonation it is rather filling even after a single pint. I can see drinking this in the evening with friends or family, or drinking one with a steak dinner, but I can't imagine anyone slamming these at a party. I certainly recommend this brew as a drinkable, and flavorful expression of what a stout is while not being completely overbearing.

Guinness Draught B / 3.75 look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | drink: 3.5 Nitro-bottle Glass Video of the Guinness Cascade from my new blog Appearance: Average pour, noticeable bubbles due to the nitro. I very much like the cascade effect with the nitro-bottle as it also produces a very nice head that builds quickly, but settles to about ¼ inch with a very dense light khaki foam. The brew appears black, but when held to the light you can see the bulb dimly through the glass, with a very dark amber glow. The lacing was thick and held to the glass through the drink and even lasted after I finished. Smell: The first thing I noticed was the abundant malts and the lighter spicyness, there was some toffee sweetness and hints of an espresso. The aroma was pleasant without being too strong. Taste: First taste is the dark malts with a nice level of flavor, followed by some mild hop spices and ends with a bite of bitterness on the back and sides of my tongue. There are not a lot of heavy flavors other than the malts followed by the hops. I like the light sweetness on the tip of my tongue and the espresso aroma it leaves in my nose. The after-taste is mostly mild bitterness in the back of my mouth with the lingering malt flavor. Nowhere in my tasting did I notice any taste of alcohol in this brew. Mouthfeel: The head was very smooth on my lips and tongue, the liquid was thicker than a pale ale, but not as thick as the Smithwick's Irish Ale. There was some light carbonation that set on my tongue but nothing too heavy or over-bearing. It also had a very nice clean finish without any noticeable diacetyl taste or feeling. Drinkability: This is an easy drinking brew, with good flavor and nice simple complexity without trying to do too much. This is not an afternoon BBQ beer, but a nice steak dinner brew for those looking for a change.

I haven't had a specific Porter yet, unless you count stouts as porters which I believe technically you could. What's the difference between a porter and a stout?

A few hours after my Smithwick's review I heard one of the Guinness Draught nitro-cans calling my name, I drank that one cold and was very pleased with it. I think tonight's review will be the nitro-bottle of Guinness, served slightly cooler than room temp. Gotta love that rich malt flavor.

Tonight's sampling: Smithwick's Irish Ale (a Guinness Brew) A- / 4.05 (might be a bit high, but an easy B or B+) look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | drink: 4 Bottle (pint glass) Cold but not frigid Appearance: Smithwick's has a very smooth pour and begins to develop a nice head that builds as you pour, the head was very white and built to about an inch or so, it faded about half way before my first sip but held through the drink finishing with a layer over the brew as I finished, it gave a nice lace but didn't cover the entire glass. The brew is a dark amber color, that looked to me like a cola drink that had been watered down, or a very dark iced tea, it has a great clarity with no murkiness at all. I saw light carbonation bubbles coming from the bottom of the glass. I liked the head on the brew, but the coloring seemed like it was trying to be two things amber and black so that left me questioning what was coming. Smell: I smelled immediately after popping the cap and was hit with the spice of hops. After pouring, the smell dissipated a bit but the hops were still very noticeable. It smelled very much like a lighter ale with a bright smell, and what I would guess is a floral scent but not overly sweet. I think I detected a hint of citrus as well though if present it was hidden fairly well. Over all the scent was pleasant but not overbearing. The abundance of the spice was very noticeable but not unpleasant at all. Taste: The first thing I noticed was the hoppy spice taste on my tongue, the more I drank the more I noticed the malts. If I gave an order I would say it started with a stronger hops taste then shifted to a more mild malt, then finished with the spice of hops again. When lightly swirling the brew in my mouth I could taste and feel the spice of the hops on the back and the sides of my tongue. When exhaling through my nose under the spice I could smell the malts. The taste seemed much lighter than the coloring might have indicated, but it was still robust and not watered down in the least. There also was no discernable alcohol taste or smell. Mouthfeel: One of the first things I noticed was that the brew felt as smooth as it poured, and left a buttery feel in my mouth. This was certainly thicker than a Pale Ale or a summer ale, and rolled nicely in my mouth, almost creamy. The carbonation was a bit surprising as it fizzed a bit in my mouth even while I didn't notice that much in the pour or while looking at it in the glass. When sliding the brew in my mouth I could really feel the thickness which seemed to create a bit of foam in my mouth with very little effort, the effect was a very creamy texture that was quite pleasant. Drinkability: This seemed very drinkable, and even with the fizziness I did not feel bloated at all. I cannot imagine downing these quickly but over the course of an evening I don't think it would be unpleasant to have a couple of these. I would definitely recommend Smithwick's to someone wanting a bolder take on an ale, and I will be adding this brew to my repeat business list.

There is not enough money in the world that would get me up on that tower Pope!! Nice lightning strike, and that is why rednecks shouldn't fly kites with Bud cans strapped to them.

After 712 pages, I'm not even going to pretend to check if this is a repost. Every time I see this my stomach twinges, and I have the urge to just grab onto something.

One step ahead of ya, I have the remnants of that same variety pack in my fridge from last week's sampling. *edit and I'm going to sample them close together to see the difference, I know there is more than the hopps just gotta find out what.

My mother was a raging alcoholic for years and only drank wine...trust me no snootiness there. I understand what you're saying, and the Bud's etc are still there but with the rise of craft beers there seems to be a move toward experimentation and variation of flavor, plus it opens the door to the historic brews that were virtually unknown to here in the states, then along came Jim Koch with Samuel Adams and opened the door to a whole new world, of microbrewing, home brewing, craft brewing, not to mention the appreciation for the many styles. Personally, I like it because its a whole new world of flavors that I haven't experienced before, and if I'm going to sit back and sip on something in the evening it'll most likely be a Diet Mt. Dew.

I'm not sure about the others but Sam's Summer Ale is an easy brew to drink and quite refreshing served cold, but then its a summer ale so its supposed to be right? I actually list Sam's Summer pretty close to Sam's Hefeweizen and Pale Ale, I couldn't tell much difference between them, variations in hoppiness but that was about all I could tell; but I haven't had enough to really discern what's going on uniqely with each of them soo, I guess I'll have to try them again...:2drunks:Yay, what a cool hobby.

I can't see myself drinking hot beer, but warm as in room temp yeah, I like Sam Adam's Black Lager at room temp, but I can also drink it cold just as easily, but the warmer it is the more you taste the chocolate malts.

Yeah! Real men don't have tastebuds and if we do then we burn them off!

Guess so

How do you get the blue arrow, I've tried and can't figure it out. *edit Ok...wait when I quoted and then deleted the pic before nothing happens, do you just need to type in something in the box to take the space?

All of the sudden the relationship is beginning to make sense.

Wow, Mike that one thar is a keeper.

I'm trying to figure out what is wrong with Obama eating a hotdog...do people eat them some other way than open mouth insert hot dog?

Now that made me lol...not the chick but the cry baby.

Bush "Game Over" made me LOLz

Dead biiirrrrd....gonna put it on youuuuu..... ~Eddie Murphy