mAshparie36 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I didnt seem him out there on any series. was it just me? or was he not out there? Doesnt say anything about him on the injury report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sith lord Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I saw him in uniform on the sidelines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dg28daman Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I was thinking that myself. Although he could have been in a lot for all we know, we ran about ten times as much as we passed today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAshparie36 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 wow, i didnt see him there on any of the sideline camera shots. guess they didnt play him huh? oh well, today was all sorts of mess on that side of the ball. he could be helpful next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I didn't see Lloyd (B-inlaw says he did), McCardell or Caldwell in the game today from the stands.... How pathetic is this WR corps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheusmeyers Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I was at the game and didn't see McArdell on the field for a single play. And Lloyd was only out there for 4-5 plays. It was mainly Moss and El, or Thrash as the single WR in the jumbo set. Was a little surprised to not see 80 out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Washington53fan Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 according to the official stat sheet, he never got into the game...I saw thrash in a lot (running plays)...and lloyd even got onto the field a few times... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAshparie36 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 yea lloyd got put in again to do dirty work and block, then one pass he gets is the one campbell got close to being sacked but CP clipped the dude just barely, then campbell threw too high sigh just sums up the offense right there today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir L Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 The starting WR barely got the ball so it makes no sense that he would play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diggs43 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I was def looking for him on 3rd down. He's shown to be a reliable target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAshparie36 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 The starting WR barely got the ball so it makes no sense that he would play you make no sense. so the #1 has the get the ball first before anyone else can? you sir... you should be apply for a job at NFL network as an analyst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what_would_joe_gibbs_do Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 who cares if he didnt play. we won. he still gets paid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Vet Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 ... Anyone notice in my picture of the depth chart that Pucillo is the 2nd & 3rd string Left Guard? I hope nothing happens to 2nd string Pucillo as the ghost of Pucillo isn't nearly as good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD Riggo Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 They said in pre-game that Caldwell would be inactive (don't know why). As to McCardell .. we could-ve used him AND Caldwell. I'm glad to see us commit to the run, but our passing game is one dimensional. Having to use Cooley so much for protection until some of our O-line recovers, we really need to take some long shots to open up our run game. Instead, we are either running the ball or passing two yards behind the LOS EVERY play! Doing it like that, it's no wonder we are three-and-out every series. When the D only has to cover within ten yards of the LOS every play, we'll NEVER make first downs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAshparie36 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 who cares if he didnt play. we won. he still gets paid. i understand that. i just wanted to know where he was. if he was injured, not being put in, etc. thanks for answering my question and giving positive input! DF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what_would_joe_gibbs_do Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 my point is why do you have to know why a player didnt play. according to the game i saw we did fine without him. everyone is always looking for an answer for what they saw or didnt see and what the coaches call. some questions are better off not asked, like why are we here and is there really a god, and are we really alone out there.............who the hell cares, enjoy 4-2. i thought moss was gonna have this 27 catches for 683 yards game according to cp this week on coach thompons show, since he was all jacked up after dropping balls last week. so i beleive he just wasnt in "the packages" we sent out there today because we were doing other stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAshparie36 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 my point is why do you have to know why a player didnt play. according to the game i saw we did fine without him. everyone is always looking for an answer for what they saw or didnt see and what the coaches call. some questions are better off not asked, like why are we here and is there really a god, and are we really alone out there.............who the hell cares, enjoy 4-2. i thought moss was gonna have this 27 catches for 683 yards game according to cp this week on coach thompons show, since he was all jacked up after dropping balls last week. so i beleive he just wasnt in "the packages" we sent out there today because we were doing other stuff. annnnnnnndddd i stopped caring about two sentences into your post. your point is why do i have to know? your point is invalid, thus i dont care. people like you try to come on here and be smart, unlike others who are supportive and open to discussion and helping people out with questions and thoughts. i highly suggest your re-evaluate your intention when coming on here, opening up a thread that you have nothing good to say about, and just move on. last time i checked, we were all here in for the good of B&G. that is clearly not the case for you because you dont believe in God and think that they're aliens out there. that and you thought we did fine today without him. :applause: bravo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bih Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 passing game is just horrible! He seems to play good when hes in there. plus he gets really psyched about the game the whole time. I like him, should use him more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi6 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 The coaches did not play McCardell or B Llyod. They were using max protect schemes most of the game with either one or two wideouts. 4 and 5 WR sets were just not part of the equation. Cheers mate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjTj Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 The coaches did not play McCardell or B Llyod. They were using max protect schemes most of the game with either one or two wideouts. 4 and 5 WR sets were just not part of the equation. Cheers mate! We actually ran relatively little true "max protect" today. The TE's and RB's often chipped and went out into passing routes. Campbell took his share of hits.We ran a number of 3 WR sets. We have almost never run 4 WR this season (sometimes we do it where the fourth receiver split out wide is a TE - usually Cooley). I think Lloyd was the third WR today. He got in on a number of plays and had one pass thrown at him. Thrash was the fourth receiver and had two passes thrown at him (he caught one). McCardell must have been the fifth receiver, so he didn't see the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.