Waleo32 Posted March 18, 2005 Author Share Posted March 18, 2005 Originally posted by skinzfan4life How is the gardner angle opinionated...he has dropped a lot of passes, just like DT. Let me apologize, didn't you say Terrell isn't good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waleo32 Posted March 18, 2005 Author Share Posted March 18, 2005 Originally posted by skinzfan4life How is the gardner angle opinionated...he has dropped a lot of passes, just like DT. Let me apologize, didn't you say Terrell isn't good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzfan4life Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Im ssaying we have a guy who is just as good if not better then DT in gardner and we are trying to get rid of him because he drops a lot of passes, so why would we want DT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waleo32 Posted March 18, 2005 Author Share Posted March 18, 2005 Originally posted by skinzfan4life Im ssaying we have a guy who is just as good if not better then DT in gardner and we are trying to get rid of him because he drops a lot of passes, so why would we want DT? Ok I didn't think Terrell was that bad with drop balls. The only problem with Terrell to me is he gets too involved in the game meaning his temper. Thats my opinion. I think we all haven't seen the real Terrell. It's like you have a kid and seen him play ball (B-Ball) very well. But when you watch him player others, he isn't using his whole potential and he feels discouraged. That is what I see in D. Terrell. I think he was hoping to start in Chicago sooner than later and he got discourage. I don't think we have seen the real D. Terrell thats all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzfan4life Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Thats understandable, but at this point in his career he is a downgrade to gardner, and he more then likely would not start here either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waleo32 Posted March 18, 2005 Author Share Posted March 18, 2005 Originally posted by skinzfan4life Thats understandable, but at this point in his career he is a downgrade to gardner, and he more then likely would not start here either. The funny thing about it is Terrell skills in college was better than Edwards. Edwards is faster but he drops the easy passes. I preferred Terrell's game over Edwards. That's what makes me mad about Terrell I know he's good, and better than Gardner. But he has to take it. But hopefully he gets into the right situation. Don't get it twisted I'm still high on Gardner, I really 100 percent feel that gardner needs a different setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzfan4life Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 I agree on gardner, i think he has worn out his welcome here. And he prob does need another setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 He'll provide nothing for us. I live in somewhat Bears country and know enough. He was in Robinson's and Booker's shadow because he wouldn't step out of it. He was hyped up and given a chance to be a star, but the other two did instead, No thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.