jmwills1 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 What do yall think about David Terrell? Given how we have 3 smallish receivers (Moss, Patten, Jacobs), do you think we need a bigger receiver? I think that Terrell could be a very good receiver. He got screwed when he was drafted by the bears. I do not think that Edwards or williams will be available when we draft and I am not sold on the others (White, Williamson, Clayton, etc) as good picks at #9. I think Terrell could be a very good receiver in our offense. I was drinking when I thought that he would be a good addition so Iwanted to see if it was the alcohol or if it was a good thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skin_finatic Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 I think there was a thread on this before...and on that thread I think i said "N + O = NO, but i forgot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyansRangers Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 UMMMMMMMMMM how bout a large glass of NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skin_finatic Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Heres a new one for this thread....B*U*S*T = BUST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 most people will say alcohol I dont know much about Terrell, but players who switch teams either resurrect their career or suck worse than ever. Joe Salave'a, Ron Warner, Ryan Clark, that's all they have in common, former rejects. If Terrell comes really cheap, and is happy to be used as a posession receiver, I wouldnt mind trying him out. Id rather draft Mike Williams instead though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmwills1 Posted March 6, 2005 Author Share Posted March 6, 2005 Sorry everyone. I did not know that there was already a thread on him. I still think its a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Originally posted by jmwills1 Sorry everyone. I did not know that there was already a thread on him. I still think its a good idea I'd take a chance on him at the vet minimum with incentives. It'd be worth a shot. Besides, who did he have throwing him the ball???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matador36 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 I predict a no storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmwills1 Posted March 6, 2005 Author Share Posted March 6, 2005 Originally posted by DieselPwr44 I'd take a chance on him at the vet minimum with incentives. It'd be worth a shot. Besides, who did he have throwing him the ball???? This is exactly my point (even though I did not mention it). He never had a good QB. They had what, 4 different starting QBs this year. I still think he could be a very good WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 I'd rather run across the middle with #36 in my way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunherz54 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Terrell = R. Moss attitude without R. Moss performance. Pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilgamesh Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Why not suggest open tryouts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 You cant be serious...David Terrell is HORRIBLE!!! ahhh nuh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 I'd take him for a year with the minimum contract. The kid still has potential, there is no denying that and he has never played on a good offense with a good qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 maybe im just sour...but that dude always looked bad...drops..whoah dude is like 20/80. Serious concentration probs or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Dave Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 No thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: :no: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilgamesh Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 I think this thread should be moved to a non football forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tizzod Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Originally posted by fdarugar The kid still has potential A 20 year old poster calling Terrell "kid" :laugh: that's funny. But he's been in the NFL, what, 4 years or so? We would have seen his potential by now I think. His potential is to act like a total idiot, take dumb penalties ALL the time, and drop a lot of balls. Thank you, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Where is that NO guy from the Capital One Commercial when you need him.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Redskin Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 So exactly who from the first round of that draft can catch? We have K.Robinson who drops alot, D.Terrell who can't catch, R.Gardner nickname 50/50, S.Moss who can't (oh wait he is on our team now), F.Mittchell peoples chump, R.Wayne from the U he is pretty good but has many other 0-fensive weapons around which allow him more possibilities. In Terrells defense, M.Robinson had a few mediocre seasons while in Chicago and then had some success with the ravens backup/ex boys QB Wright throwing to him. And then did well with the vikes. As with gardner he may be more sucessful with a new address. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 NO,NO,NO!!! Unless, he wanted to be a walk-on at training camp and sign for the league minimum (for his vet status) like Trotter did last year with the Eagles. Other than that--NO! Terrell is an overall bust. Probably moreso than Gardner or Travis Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 Maybe he is bust but how can you tell?? With Quinn, Hutchinson, Miller(just to name a few) throwing the ball, how does anyone make a judgement? Oh well, it was just a thought/suggestion.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 so, let's see. we get rid of one stupid football player that can't or won't prepare himself and focus on his job for 16 weeks in Gardner and now you want to go out and get another underachiever? I am disappointed in you Mother Gibbs is adding hard working players this offseason and passed on Randy Moss and Plaxico Burress at least in part because of attitude concerns. Terrell doesn't fit our 'new' model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citigent Posted March 6, 2005 Share Posted March 6, 2005 id take a look at the min. only , incentives maybe but they wont be give ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.