KWilliamsAWinfield Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Don't be suprised if Vikings send the #7 pick for Coles, yes, we're that dumb. *Sighs* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inmate running the asylum Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Well personally I don't think you guys got enough in trade for Randy Moss, but I doubt we would be lucky enough to get your #7 for Coles. Napoleon Harris was highly touted at the time he was drafted -- and had a good rookie year -- but has not been that great of a linebacker since. And if the player you guys pick at #7 turns out to be a bust or just a mediocre player, you guys will have been raped by Al Davis. :moon: Kind of like the Hershel Walker trade revisited. :laugh: But I guess McCombs decided it was better to put Moss' $7 million in HIS bank account instead of Moss' bank account, now that the team has been sold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 It's more likely you'd trade yr #18. A deal, by the way, I'd take happily. We could then take Mark Clayton, who has some LC in him anyway and take Pac Man at #9 to replace Smoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Ernie5 It's more likely you'd trade yr #18. A deal, by the way, I'd take happily. We could then take Mark Clayton, who has some LC in him anyway and take Pac Man at #9 to replace Smoot. Aaaahhh, another Mark Clayton fan. We shall call him Mighty Mouse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I would see the viking go after smoot before coles, but thats just me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredskinz Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Kevin B. I would see the viking go after smoot before coles, but thats just me... I totally agree... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 This is a Vikings FO that ran out of time and forfeitted their draft picks two years in a row. Yes, they ARE that stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cskin Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 The Redskins couldn' t afford to have the #7 and #9 draft picks very long. It's a great scenario... because the team could trade the #9 back down the draft board and pick up a plethora of 1st day picks yet still get the guy we all speculate they want.... Mike Williams. But... that ain't happening. The Vikes are in a great position to significantly bolster their team... I don't see them screwing that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsaddict Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 i dont want pac-man. i've seen him play. not that good. his attitude is piss poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCMONEY Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 At this point I'd damn sure take the #7 pick for Coles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BleedinBurgundyandGold Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Cskin The Redskins couldn' t afford to have the #7 and #9 draft picks very long. It's a great scenario... because the team could trade the #9 back down the draft board and pick up a plethora of 1st day picks yet still get the guy we all speculate they want.... Mike Williams. But... that ain't happening. The Vikes are in a great position to significantly bolster their team... I don't see them screwing that up. we've kept the #2 and #3 picks haven't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BleedinBurgundyandGold Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 arrington and samuels i meant, sorry if that wasn't clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins11 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 And will the Vikings also magically relieve the incredible cap burden that would result from a trade? :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 But... that ain't happening. The Vikes are in a great position to significantly bolster their team... I don't see them screwing that up. Oh but they will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 for that 7th overall. I'll give you Coles....and Chad Morton. Its a steal...(for one of us). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Bufford for that 7th overall. I'll give you Coles....and Chad Morton. Its a steal...(for one of us). I'm all for that deal as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.