varvar Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 I watched a couple of other games and it dawned on me, why dont we throw to our third or fourth receiver.. I remember Ricky sanders catching a few balls, but I haven't even seen thrash or jacobs even near one...I saw vinny killing the browns with Bryant and Glenn in the 3rd spot, so why doesn't gibbs try to get thrash out there for a ten yard out im sure he can get open....httr... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakofthesouth Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 W/ Brunell, we don't even have a #1 reciever. Just a TE and a RB. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 If Ramsey starts Monday, I'd hope we activate McCants. Actually, I'd like to see him activated anyways! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red zone Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 This offense is in it's infantsy. I'd expect Thrash, Jacobs or McCants to emerge as a solid #3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 I don;t think we have a number 2 receiver. Gardner dropped the game winning TD...blame him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny_Blaze Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Originally posted by Riggotoni If Ramsey starts Monday, I'd hope we activate McCants. Actually, I'd like to see him activated anyways! I agree, activate McCants... we signed him to a new deal and we have him sitting out each week. Hes a good reciever, LETS GET HIM IN THERE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommytd Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 What I dont understand is why dont you guys start Hasselback if Brunell cant go. Seems like he gives you a better chance to win and frankly seems to be a bit brighter than that Tulane boy of yours......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RySkins Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Thrash stays in to block frequently when we are expecting blitz and running max protection. It is very strange though that he hasn't even been thrown one pass yet, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afparent Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 I am starting to wonder if coach gibbs and company do not have as much confidence in the o-line as he would like. Maybe that is the reason we either don't send a 3rd receiver out or have time to check down to him. Just a thought. Talk amongst yourselves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommytd Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Thrash is horrible guys. Plain and simple. He couldn't perform on a more talented Eagles team, he sure is hell isn't going to step it up on a less talented offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufumonk Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Thrash has to get open before we can think of him as an option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Chris TOO COOL Cooley!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soliloquy Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Thrash was thrown to at least once. He knocked down a near interception. I'm pretty sure he was the target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufumonk Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Originally posted by Soliloquy Thrash was thrown to at least once. He knocked down a near interception. I'm pretty sure he was the target. Target was Coles if I remember correctly. The ball was batted into the air, and Thrash prevented the pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocono Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 Gibbs 1st priority is to protect the QB so he keeps extra people in to block so there are fewer receivers out on a pattern. It's a bad sign when a Gibbs team gives up 4 sacks. It's like a team that routinely sends 4-5 people out giving up 8 sacks. When 2 sacks are recorded by Fred Robbins who had 4 sacks in 4 years before yesterday's game I think you have to wonder about what kind of job was done by the OLM across from him and that would be Dockery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.