terpfan Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 bailey - 50 owens - 1 kinda lopsided huh? come on back champ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Yeah, close call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander PK Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Here's why we don't take Owens Coles, Gardner, McCants, Jacobs Here's why we do take Dillon Canidate, Betts, McCullough I'd keep Bailey, somebody else can have the egomaniac Owens! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvan Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Originally posted by Henry 38-1 so far. Ok. I voted for Bailey too, but I thought Owens would get more votes. Just for the sake of agruement, let me ruminate: Could you imagine Ramsey or Brunell throwing the ball to Owens and Coles? Holy Moly Moly. You could easily go max protect all the time with those two running routes. By most accounts on this board, Smoot is capable of being the #1 guy. Why not get a decent #2 CB at a reasonable price, shore up the DL through the draft and have a simply monster offense? Just a thought. The fields not big enough for both Owens and Coles. TO the big baby would cry and cry if he can't have every ball. Let the baby go to Philly and we'll cover him with Champ. :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottb Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 Noone has yet mentioned (unless I missed it) one of the biggest reasons to take Bailey....he's younger. He's approaching the peak years. Owens is towards the end of his career. For the money, Bailey is a MUCH better bargain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edskin69 Posted February 9, 2004 Share Posted February 9, 2004 i vote for champ!!! must resign!! champ!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted February 10, 2004 Share Posted February 10, 2004 New poll indicates atleast 6 members are crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hogwash Posted February 10, 2004 Share Posted February 10, 2004 Originally posted by Lavarisgod Uh...thats a big negative....I'd rather have a disgruntled Bailey than a disgruntled Owens. I'd rather have a disgruntled Bailey over a born again TO, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kleese Posted February 10, 2004 Share Posted February 10, 2004 Someone please answer my question on whether or not you'd trade Champ for Owens and the #7 overall pick in the draft? IMO, THAT is the real question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.