Guest Matt Kyriacou Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 Will somebody please tell me why Champ wasn't back in the 2nd half? At some point they mentioned that he had a scratch on his face and had not returned from the locker room to start the half and then I never saw or heard of him again. Please tell me that it was/is something more serious than that when we have guys like Coles and Ramsey gutting it out with broken bones in their feet and leaving it all out there on the field. Seems to me he got "I-just-got-toasted-by-Marty-Booker-and-don't-want-to-play-anymore-itis". Someone tell me. Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 "Bailey was beaten by receiver Marty Booker for a 59-yard touchdown on the Bears´ fifth play of the game. Bailey suffered a deep facial cut and a mild concussion on the play when he tried to make a diving tackle to prevent a Booker from scoring and putting the Bears up 7-3. Bailey returned for the next couple of series, then left the game before halftime. " This according to an article in the times. So yea. It was kinda serious. That concussion thing I would imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 He had a concussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdsknbill Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 He had third degree burns, from his burning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 concussion probably added so the pretty boy wouldn't look as bad for his leaving game due to vanity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 He is a ***** we don't need players like that on our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitnskins Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 I'll take and prefer Rashad Baumen and his aggressive style over Chump Bailey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB81 Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 Originally posted by Dolemite I'll take and prefer Rashad Baumen and his aggressive style over Chump Bailey. You are now the leader in the clubhouse for "Idiotic Post of the Day." Well crafted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibrahim Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 I heard he had a bruise on his cheek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posse81 Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 Lost in all this is the fact that Bauman played a very solid game for us. Some people here like to bash Bauman, but he seems to be a pretty solid corner in his second year. From what I can tell, he only gave up three short completions and played solid run support. Smoot played well too, but gave up more completions than Bauman did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.