TODD Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Was it Prioleau or was it Archuleta? I distinctly remember someone (Williams?) saying after the game that Prioleau was the starter and that's why it was so hard losing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeSkin Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 It was Prioleau. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
909997 Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 it was prioleau because he knew the plays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-O-G Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Prioleau was the starter. Adam would come in on strictly run downs to play up close to the line on a blitz to stop the run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDSKNfaithfull Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 I know for a fact Prioleau was running all first team snaps during the pre game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoudMouth12thMan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Prioleau was the starter.Adam would come in on strictly run downs to play up close to the line on a blitz to stop the run. Not entirely true b/c of Williams used-to-be-famed 3-2-6 look in which Arch would also line up as a backer or in one of the "6" spots. Since nearly every member dismissed Prioleau's injury at the time, now do you see why it was such a blow? Hate to say I told you so. I remember sitting in the stands thinking, "that was bigger than anyone realizes". I even mentioned it on multiple threads that week after the Vikes loss. It was huge along with Springs myriad injury issues all season long. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.