TK Posted November 19, 2006 Share Posted November 19, 2006 Chances are you've been merged into one of the following threads: QB Thread Offense Thread - NON QB Coaching Thread Defense Thread Special Teams Thread Why? Because you're cluttering cluttering the board. And you may have found yourself in the No New Threads group. So before you go screaming "nazi mods" or "censorship" or some other nonsense, check yourself & right click on your user name, go to Find Posts By User & I'll bet you'll find yourself in one of the above listed threads, or merged into either the game thread or Art's Post Game Thread. And for those in the NNT group who are wondering how to get out of it. You know how to get of it? You PM me with the thread link that landed you in the group. And say "My bad. I didn't search/look at the first page before posting my thread. It won't happen again." Or something to that effect. Basiclly, show us you know you messed up, where you messed up, & apologize for it. It's that simple. Instead, I get PMs like this: "Why no new threads?" Don't be that guy. :secret:That guy gets ignored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'KanSkinFan Posted November 19, 2006 Share Posted November 19, 2006 :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky TK rocks!:point2sky :point2sky :point2sky :point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliredskinsfan Posted November 19, 2006 Share Posted November 19, 2006 Thank you TK! I never start a new thread b/c the majority of the time the topic I may want to discuss already has 4 or 5 of them started. Act like you've been here before. Hail to the Redskins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercuryrising Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Can you put all the "who do we cut in 2007?" threads into one as well. It is getting ridiculous... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark The Homer Posted November 22, 2006 Share Posted November 22, 2006 I was just thinking about this today: If a thread starts, even if it's a good thread, it shoots off to page 2 and into oblivion in about an hour and a half. That's a shame. I don't know what the answer is, except, perhaps, just block from posting every member whose membership number is, say, 30,000+ or so. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Die Hard Posted November 22, 2006 Share Posted November 22, 2006 I was just thinking about this today: If a thread starts, even if it's a good thread, it shoots off to page 2 and into oblivion in about an hour and a half. That's a shame. I don't know what the answer is, except, perhaps, just block from posting every member whose membership number is, say, 30,000+ or so. :-) Hey Mark... page 2 isn't oblivion. Don't be afaid to click on the link that says "Page 2" and "Page 3" and so on. If you don't have any interest in reading the first 40 thread titles... that's on you bud. You're the one that has made the decision that "if it hasn't been posted in the last 1.5 hours... it isn't important enough to me". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insomniac Posted November 22, 2006 Share Posted November 22, 2006 what if someone starts a redundant redundant thread thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted November 22, 2006 Author Share Posted November 22, 2006 what if someone starts a redundant redundant thread thread? Then they get to ban the guy that asks that question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryanjr2003 Posted November 22, 2006 Share Posted November 22, 2006 what if someone starts a redundant redundant thread thread? Hey enjoy being banned and read the above cause you wont be reinstated till you do it :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark The Homer Posted November 22, 2006 Share Posted November 22, 2006 Hey Mark... page 2 isn't oblivion. Don't be afaid to click on the link that says "Page 2" and "Page 3" and so on.If you don't have any interest in reading the first 40 thread titles... that's on you bud. You're the one that has made the decision that "if it hasn't been posted in the last 1.5 hours... it isn't important enough to me". That's not it at all. The problem is, I'm only human. I have other things to do besides read extremeskins posts every waking hour or two. My point is, it's virtually impossible to read everything because there's just so much. Therefore good posts / threads get by me unread. I think this is pretty much an acknowledged problem, and I don't have any idea what the solution is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.