hands11 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Well they just switched to the 26 year old Romo sits to pee who is mobile and its made a difference already. Even with a poor O line in this game, they are already releasing more receivers because Romo sits to pee can run away from the rush. He also just converted a 2 pt conversion with a run. Hell, Bledsoe This could be interesting if we have to play against Dallas who made the switch while 4-2 and behind in a big game against the Giants. If they stay will Romo sits to pee another week, this will get lots of coverage come Dallas week and if we loss, Gibbs will get rostered (in the media) for not making the switch to Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Hell, Bledsoe Bledsoe ran for a TD (though it might not have been quite) and that is something that Brunell last did--when? Seriously he knows how to run backwards and back and to the left but that's about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaRora Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 just bout to make this post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Great post, my thoughts exactly. I HATE da cowgirlz, and I dont know if their gonna come back in win this game, but Romo sits to pee iz looking good. We're the only team in the league still stuck on stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 And, as we will, they are living with the rookie mistakes too. He has two picks already. You take the good with the bad...I think this is easier for Dallas fans to watch than Bledsoe...at least there is promise of the unknown potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuggs Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 They should have looked at last years game at FedEx. Bledsoe had all day long to throw the ball this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAP91Si Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 With Romo sits to pee throwing pics it won't help Cambell's cause in the eyes of Gibbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Well they just switched to the 26 year old Romo sits to pee who is mobile and its made a difference already. Even with a poor O line in this game, they are already releasing more receivers because Romo sits to pee can run away from the rush. He also just converted a 2 pt conversion with a run. Hell, BledsoeThis could be interesting if we have to play against Dallas who made the switch while 4-2 and behind in a big game against the Giants. If they stay will Romo sits to pee another week, this will get lots of coverage come Dallas week and if we loss, Gibbs will get rostered for not making the switch to Campbell. Romo sits to pee throws a pick in the giants redzone, then they score a td to go up by 19, and now he throws another pick when Dallas is driving, yep Gibbs is going to make a change now :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
337 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 yup. only 2 interceptions for Romo sits to pee so far. not bad. but in all seriousness -- he does seem to have more of a presence on the field than bledsoe. adds that scrambling element as well. i wish we had a coaching staff that was willing to take a risk like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoudMouth12thMan Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Well they just switched to the 26 year old Romo sits to pee who is mobile and its made a difference already. Even with a poor O line in this game, they are already releasing more receivers because Romo sits to pee can run away from the rush. He also just converted a 2 pt conversion with a run. Hell, BledsoeThis could be interesting if we have to play against Dallas who made the switch while 4-2 and behind in a big game against the Giants. If they stay will Romo sits to pee another week, this will get lots of coverage come Dallas week and if we loss, Gibbs will get rostered for not making the switch to Campbell. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Two picks later in which one was thrown directly to a DT on a screen... Way to have supports for your argument... Enter foot in mouth at any time... HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 It's the attitude of the team you have to look at. ANd it's his first real start, you can't judge it the same way. The question Bill asked himself, I think, is "can we continue with Drew at this moment and win games and win the title?" No. That's why he switched. It has nothing to do with whether or not Romo sits to pee is going to make mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hands11 Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 Romo sits to pee throws a pick in the giants redzone, then they score a td to go up by 19, and now he throws another pick when Dallas is driving, yep Gibbs is going to make a change now :doh: Did you actually read the first post or are you just childishly in love with the :doh: icon. I said, if he starts against us and if they win, the MEDIA will be all over him. learn to read. oh annnnd :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
337 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 I like watching jacobs. Makes me think of that guy that sits on the bench as our third or fourth running back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Did you actually read the first post or are you just childishly in love with the :doh: icon.I said, if he starts against us and if they win, the MEDIA will be all over him. learn to read. oh annnnd :doh: the media will be on him no matter who is playing and if we lose, then we are 2-6 and the season is over :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 It's the attitude of the team you have to look at. ANd it's his first real start, you can't judge it the same way.The question Bill asked himself, I think, is "can we continue with Drew at this moment and win games and win the title?" No. That's why he switched. It has nothing to do with whether or not Romo sits to pee is going to make mistakes. The look on his face shows either he had some bad pasta today or he made a big mistake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ez2envy Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Dammit Romo sits to pee is persuaing Gibbs to stay with Brunell!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_U Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Tip my hat to Bill Parcells. Despite the constant pressure that wasnt necessarily Bledsoe's fault, Drew did make sure poor decisions and it just wasnt working. Call me silly, but it does sound familiar. ITS NOT WORKING, ENTER #17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 See what a quarterback change can do for a team? 3 interceptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheUSkins Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 crap, our dreaded rivals have beaten us again! They are making the move for the future and decided to stop living in the past BEFORE we do!! It is always a competition w. dallas!! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jshac48 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 For all the Brunell haters(me included)...see the Cowboys for example #1 of why Gibbs is sticking with Brunell. Tony Romo sits to pee 1 TD 3 INT's in 1 half. Not saying that JC is going to perform like that, but the possibility exists. It's easy to hold the clipboard..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 See what a quarterback change can do for a team?3 interceptions. and the way our defense is playing we can not afford to give the other team 17 easy points like Romo sits to pee did tonight This is why Gibbs is going to ride Mark to he can't walk anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wshngtn1 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 See what a quarterback change can do for a team?3 interceptions. See what the starting QB did in the first half? Nothing but an INT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Master III Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Jason Campbell>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Romo sits to pee And how about that TD pass just now by Romo sits to pee! Start Campbell!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Tip my hat to Bill Parcells. Despite the constant pressure that wasnt necessarily Bledsoe's fault, Drew did make sure poor decisions and it just wasnt working. Call me silly, but it does sound familiar. ITS NOT WORKING, ENTER #17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'd NEVER back the cowgirlz, but propz to Parcells for having the balls to make the right change. It didnt pan out, but Tony Romo sits to pee hasnt got many reps with the starters neither. Whoa, TONY Romo sits to pee JUST THREW A TOUCHDOWN!!!!!!!! They still losing though :laugh: :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLiverpool Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 I hope he's watching, because the Skins kinda gotta game plan for the Boys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.