thinker Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Here's a link to a Chicago story on Randel El: http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/cs-060125bears,1,6045630.story?coll=cs-bears-headlines&ctrack=1&cset=true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Jurevicious (sp?) isn't coming to the Redskins. The reason he said he left Tampa Bay for Seattle, was that he grew in Seattle and has family there, and wanted to finish his career there. Didn't Jurevicius grow up in Lithuania? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm0304 Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 You have to remember, Gary Clark was only 5'7. And was a lot more productive than Randall El's great season of 35 rec for 558 yds 1 Td and 4 Fumbles. In my eyes he is over-rated but everyones got their own opinion on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSKN5 Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 randle el wont help our team. hes a firecracker, and we need a ham sandwich I was actually leaning more towards a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.... just my opinion though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 randle el wont help our team. hes a firecracker, and we need a ham sandwich ham sandwich? i thought he was a quarterback that said, i still say we pick up kevin curtis, and get either sinorice moss or devin hester in the draft. i know, we need a possession receiver, but thats incredible talent right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Word out of Cardinals camp is that Denny Green was going to go after Randle-El. Ah well, just another player to add to the Cards long list of losses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Word out of Cardinals camp is that Denny Green was going to go after Randle-El.Ah well, just another player to add to the Cards long list of losses. They have Boldin and Fitzgerald...would surprise me if they went after Randle El unless they were planning to trade one of those two... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Word out of Cardinals camp is that Denny Green was going to go after Randle-El.Ah well, just another player to add to the Cards long list of losses. damn that would be a crazy move...I'd trade a 2nd rounder for J-Bold or LaFitz anyday, I doubt they are trying to move Fitz though. I hear Boldin wants a new contract though, maybe he is on his way out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Word out here is that the Cards wanted him as a #3 receiver and return man. They won't be moving Fitz or Boldin:(. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fpickering Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 I dont want Randle El. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
painfulyetloyal Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 In my opinion no it isnt feasible to even think of those guys as of now. Too many teams to compete with and limited cap space to work with if we are going to fill our other needs too, Depth in O-line, D-Line, kicker. Plus Colts said they will retain Wayne even if it means Franchise Tagging him and will let James go before Wayne. That leaves a short (5' 9" ?) Randle El to be bid on by the rest of the hungry teams if he even wants to bail from Pitt after the year they are having. We are better off with a lesser known productive taller and cheaper WR to go along with what we got and use the rest of the money shoring up our other weaknessess instead of blowing the wad on 1 guy and being in the same predicament everywhere else next season. Thats just my opinion take it how you want lol. I dont mean to be negative but you guys have no idea how the team plans on working the salary cap situation. There are so many different ways it could work out. We need somebody with some talent across from Santana, thats for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Sign Moulds to be #2 - Patten goes back to #3. In a later round draft a taller WR that can play special teams and occasional #4 WR/redzone. keep Betts as back-up RB and kick returner draft or aquire FA DB that can double as punt returner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskeypeet Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 I dont mean to be negative but you guys have no idea how the team plans on working the salary cap situation. There are so many different ways it could work out. We need somebody with some talent across from Santana, thats for sure. I'm sure the FO will be very creative reworking contracts......assuming the CBA will be extended. However, with whatever wiggle room created it still remains HIGHLY unlikely that a majority of that room will be spent on one wide receiver. Signing Randle EL or Wayne would require just that. Be prepared for the signing of one of the second or third tier free agent WRs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STaylorLayintheWOOD Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Well if Dan Snyder wants Randel-El than Randel-El will want Dan Snyder. haha well said indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BD Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 I'd like Jurevicius. He's old, but he's a good possession guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Happy Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Randle-El would be a pretty good fit, but there is no way he is worth big money. Joe Jurevicius is too slow for this offense. The man had 694 yards with a Pro Bowl QB throwing to him behind a Pro Bowl offensive line with the league MVP in the backfield. Do you think he will put up those kind of numbers here? Not a chance. Can you imagine Brunell sitting in the pocket and pointing where Jurevicius should go and then throwing it to him? That would never happen in a million years. He needs a team with an offensive line that gives the QB forever to wait for him to get open, even then, he is good for 600 yards at best. We need more production out of our 2nd WR. Maybe he could be our 3rd or 4th, but not our 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.