NAILBOMB9 Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Not a negative thread or a positive thread. Wondering what your thoughts were that half of our wins are against rookie QB's.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCNightHawk Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 chicago, st. louis, and San Fran... up half our wins are against rookies, but they are still wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinzOwnU Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 well - it's not a good statistic. you could argue that "hey, at least we're beating the teams we're supposed to beat," - but we're not really since we lost to oakland and tampa bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuji869 Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Until today 3 of our wins had been against 1st place teams Chicago Dallas (until the G-Men took care of them) :thumbsup: Seattle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCRoughrider Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Would you rather lose against rookie quarterbacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lead Blocker Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 You don't win against the QBs you want to win against... You win against the QBs you have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Orton's bears are 9-3 however Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enter Apotheosis Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 We also keep VERY close games with experienced QBs (i.e. Brees, Collins, Plummer, and Green). We just happen to more soundly beat the rookies... that's to be expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0crates Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 well - it's not a good statistic. you could argue that "hey, at least we're beating the teams we're supposed to beat," - but we're not really since we lost to oakland and tampa bay. We were supposed to beat Tampa Bay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCRoughrider Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 We were supposed to beat Tampa Bay? Did you see the game? And you still have to ask? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsman4u Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 So, you do the same to Rooks as Vets ...nothing should change if its all one level of play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nostril Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 well - it's not a good statistic. you could argue that "hey, at least we're beating the teams we're supposed to beat," - but we're not really since we lost to oakland and tampa bay. I think that you should only mention oakland in this post. You know...since we did beat Tampa Bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santanamoss89 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 A win is a win. I dont care how we get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgiaredskin Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Until today 3 of our wins had been against 1st place teamsChicago Dallas (until the G-Men took care of them) :thumbsup: Seattle Thank you! Just what I was thinking. And KC, Tampa Bay and San Diego have winning records as well. (8-4) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GO GO SKINS Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 so what? I am sure any team will take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.