bcl05 Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/dr_z/09/23/owens.moss/index.html Dr. Z's new mailbag: he defends his top-10 list of receivers, in which he picks dependable, good-hands, good-blocking recievers over mental cases like TO and Moss. "The guys I picked are go-to people, clutch receivers, players who don't drop the ball. " He says he doesn't like flashy, streaky guys, but ones who pull out the big 1st down when its really needed. Isn't this the perfect description of Art Monk? Isn't it obvious? What a dweeb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthEast Skin Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 dweeb: A person regarded as socially inept or foolish, often on account of being overly studious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raub Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 He's a hypocritical Cowgirl fan. Between Peter Queen and Dr. ZZZzzzzz I don't even waste my time with SI anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Yea, I saw that too. What a bozo hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Monk Fan Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I just sent him the following for his mail bag: Dr. Z,In response to all those whining about your top ten receivers list, you said this: "The guys I picked are go-to people, clutch receivers, players who don't drop the ball. Derrick Mason and Eric Moulds, and yes, Muhammad, will pull their quarterbacks out of more tough spots than will flashier people with bigger numbers. That's what I go on -- effectiveness in the clutch, when the team absolutely has to have a first down." I couldn't agree more. That is exactly the right way to rank these guys -- according to their ability to be a complete wide receiver and their performance in the clutch. So here's my problem, then: this is the perfect definition of Art Monk, who you consistently oppose for the Hall of Fame -- I don't understand. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Dr. Z, You praise the possesion rec in your list, yet your HOF vote is constantly against one of the best poss rec of all time in Art Monk. I don't understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scruffylookin Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I'm not a big Z fan either, but I think you're confusing him and Peter King. I believe Dr. Z has been an advocate for Art Monk's inclusion into the Hall of Fame. It's King and his "New York Giant sources" that has expressed opposition to Art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankbones Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I'm not a big Z fan either, but I think you're confusing him and Peter King. I believe Dr. Z has been an advocate for Art Monk's inclusion into the Hall of Fame.It's King and his "New York Giant sources" that has expressed opposition to Art. Erroneous. Both those dimwits lead the charge against Monk every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metronoam Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 re-goddamn diculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raub Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I sent him some hate mail. Won't do any good but I feel better. Art Monk's exclusion from the HOF is a crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.