Darth Tater Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I thought Brunell did throw one deep to Patten but, like the first one in the end zone to Moss, it was about 2 or 3 yards underthrown and was defensed by Anthony Henry. Yes, that was one of the six deep throws we made. Thing is, even had it been completed, it would have been called back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHUBAKAH Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 The actually already have four, all to Moss. He had a 52 yarder against the Bears and catches of 41, 39 and 70 against the Boys. :point2sky ...and chances are, the new Star of the Washington Redskins offense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0crates Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Kevin B. - - - I love the signature! Great Post! I said last week we'd make the playoffs if we beat Dallas. I'm standing by my remarks. The Redskins are playoff bound! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Kenzo Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 So now defenses have to respect the long ball. They can't just shut down the Redskins running game and expect to win. Plus, with these types of performances by Moss, hopefully other skins receivers will be able to get open. We have gained a lot of respect with the long ball over the last 2 weeks and now with the bye week, WHOA, we should see some results. If the skins' score on a consistent basis, this team will be very scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamSneed36 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Yes, that was one of the six deep throws we made. Thing is, even had it been completed, it would have been called back. Actually it was caught behind henry and he had it wide open to the endzone, but it was called back on a penalty and its was a delay of game i think, so who knows when the whistle was blown and if it would have been completed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Wow!! Not bad for a team with no Wr's and no offense. I know...our WRs are too small and they can't catch. 28.3 yards per reception? That is terrible! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.