redskins59

I have supported moderates my whole life.  I supported Hillary over Obama (Obama was more liberal), and I supported Hillary over Bernie. Furthermore, I have supported Biden over the whole field. The reason being, I wanted someone who could be elected.

At some point though, you need to fight back.  So what I want is for the supreme court to be packed.

I am supporting a full-blown socialist left candidate  if they don't do certain things.  

 Don't try to reason with Republicans. It does not work.

1 minute ago, mammajamma said:

I haven't seen anyone give up. If anything, Ive seen more people talk about how important this election is now. If Dems don't win the senate, everything we're talking about is moot

With the supreme court rigging the election, how do we know Biden will even win?  

2 minutes ago, PokerPacker said:

That's a good way to lose the moderates and independents.

Maybe we will gain the damn Greens.

Jokes aside, if I were 60, I think I would have a heart attack today.

1 minute ago, mammajamma said:

They rightfully should... can you imagine the head explosions on fox news if they actually take away a trump justice (in addition to expanding).

Can we first impeach the ****er named Alito?  Just because he sucks ass.  Major partisan hack.

Democrats need to start  impeaching for no reason.

7 minutes ago, Simmsy said:

This is why you need a progressive and not a moderate Dem as president right now. I honestly don't believe that Biden has any interest in expanding the court or rocking the boat at all during his time as president. Hopefully, this shrill being put on the court is a good thing. If RBG held on past the election, it would still be a 5-4 court and the Dems would be happy with that. Now, they HAVE to do something. However, I'm with Mamma, if the Dems do nothing about this, I don't see the point in voting for them anymore. Whats the point of being in power if you never wield it for the good of the people who voted to give it to you? I won't waste my time anymore...

This is the damn truth.

They need to pack everything.  That's how I feel right now.

BTW, it is pretty pathetic that the majority of Americans wanted ACB confirmed.  I heard 30% democrats wanted her confirmed. Wth is wrong with them?

The supreme court needs to have bad approval rating.  They seem to be way avove 50%.  

With the success that running QB's are having, if there are running QB's available in the later rounds, why not draft them and go for a system similar to the Ravens?

The WFT has been pretty bad when it comes to drafting a QB.  Maybe try to draft a QB in the later rounds (the one that can run) and treat that position as expendable? 

Sure, she will rule against ACA, abortion and same-sex marriage. Also,  how do we know these judges won't rule in favor of segregation?  People may say ridiculuous, but it is a possiblity.

How true is this article?  The use of the N-word does not necessaily mean the workplace is hostile, according to her ruling? 

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/internet-recoils-in-horror-over-amy-coney-barrett-ruling-that-says-n-word-does-not-make-workplace-hostile/

1 minute ago, Califan007 said:

 

 

Space Invaders Against Racism is an Antifa symbol?

If you are against racism of any kind, you are basically Antifa according to the right.

Anyways, how do we even know that is even a  Space Invaders Against Racism symbol?  I see a space invaders tattoo, but it could easily be anything.

Right is claiming that he is affiliated to Antifa due to this tattoo:

33 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said:

Is she trolling or stupid? 

Has to be stupid. Anybody believing in that crap is lacking  things in the brain department. 

Give Haskins the opportunity to throw a TD.  He needs some confidence.

That looked like a catch to me.

1 minute ago, Simmsy said:

Umm...can we throw less this half, please?

I disagree, throw more.  If we want a good QB, he should be able to throw.  Win or lose.  

The game isn't over.  So let's see how Haskins bounces back.  Haskins did not throw ints before this game, but his inaccuracy has finally come to bite him.  

This guy is supposed to have played the game since he was 10 or 11.  How is he not able to throw accurately?  Further, college wasn't bad in terms of accuracy. So, what exactly is he doing?

Haskins has worked hard in the offseason.  He is failing not because he isn't working.  At some point, you just have to conclude that he doesn't have NFL-level talent.  I haven't reached that point YET.  Give him the whole year.  If we are bad, we will have the opportunity to grab another QB, as our record should be abysmal.

One thing we can say about this game is that we are losing because of Haskins.

2 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

You’re a bit of a nutter, eh?

If you look above, I said I am not commenting anymore about this.  So why do you want me to respond? 

23 minutes ago, techboy said:

 

To be perfectly honest, the things that you are writing here make the most sense to me if I assume that you're actually a Russian troll trying to make liberals and minorities look bad, push undecideds to Trump, and fire up the base.

Okay dude, but this is not facebook.  Minorities already look bad to Republicans.  Why should I be concerned?  

Should I really be concerned about energizing 10 people?

 She leads her life a certain way, and I commented on it. 

Is it super offensive?  Everybody sees that she has 7 children.  Scalia had 9.  I am saying that it may show her political leanings. Based on Scalia.

Again, caring for a special needs child is a very noble thing.  I am not attacking her.  I am talking about where she leans.  

Red flag, but in what context?  I am talking in terms of how she will rule.

Did I say caring for a special needs child is bad?  Where?

Anyways, I think I should stop this debate right here. No more response from me.

Edit: I don't think it's worth it.

6 minutes ago, just654 said:

 

I have seen some outlandish views on this site. And I normally keep my mouth shut because it isnt worth the time. But Wow!!! I am left speechless on this view. I think you should be ashamed to even think this. It is pretty much inferring you think Republicans are adopting to mistreat and abuse children. Shame on you! At least have some sort of evidence to back up your outlandish claim.    

I posted one evidence above.  A republican politician claiming that her black child is statistically more prone to violence. 

Besides all this, a conservative viewpoint is that non-whites have a  lower IQ than Whites.  

22 minutes ago, bearrock said:

 

This is a preposterous position and you should be ashamed of it.  Bad parents are bad parents.  Their political affiliation has nothing to do with it.  Stereotyping is wrong no matter who does it.

I don't understand the backlash against me tbh.  The Republican party is a White Nationalist party, and if they( meaning Republicans) adopt non-White children, I will question it. What is their motivation?  

This is a view of mine.  Democrats can't use it.  I get that.  I can see that even liberals would be pissed by this argument.

Having said all that, she is getting confirmed. Some of the right-leaning judges will shift left, and the Supreme Court will not be as right leaning as people think it will be. Again a view many will not agree with.  

7 hours ago, Corcaigh said:

You need to offer something more concrete to make those kinds of insinuations.
 

You are suggesting she is adopting kids from Haiti in order to mistreat them?

I did not say that judge Barrett is adopting kids from Haiti to mistreat them. But who would I trust, a White liberal family or a White conservative family?

Well, Laura Ingraham has 3 adopted children, one from Guatemala.  You trust her when it comes to her children?  She is blasting immigrants any chance she gets.

You probably heard about this lady a few weeks ago insinuating that her adopted black child is statistically going to commit more crime.  This is a republican politician.

 https://www.bet.com/news/national/2020/08/25/abby-johnson-son-cops-adopted-black-son.html

Now, on the flip side, I have always  trusted the McCain family. Look how they treated him though.  Calling him a RINO and all that.

Nonetheless, I trust a White liberal family over a White conservative family when it comes to adopting non-White children.

Now, this is not an attack on Catholics, as my wife went to a Catholic school.  My daughter went to a Catholic school for a year. It is known that some very religious  Catholics don't believe in contraception. Yes, more than 90% do believe in it.  Scalia with 9 children.  He is a Catholic. Now this judge with 5.  

When I googled "Catholic Contraception" , I was greeted with a passage from the 1960's. 

On the plus side, this is am educated judge with a PhD.  So maybe she is not like the politician above.

This is one thing I always wanted to say, and it applies to Scalia.  Amy Coney Barrett is somebody I don't trust due to the number of children she has.  She has 7 total children, 5 of whom are biological. 2 of them were adopted from Haiti.  This may mean that she is not a white nationalist, but then, how does she treat them?  We don't know.   Furthermore, one of her children is special needs.  Good that she can cope with all that.

Isn't this a red flag?   She probably doesn't believe in birth control.  If I recall, Scalia has 7 children. 

Let Republicans confirm their justice.  It would energize democrats. 

I say don't count on judges moving left( which could happen with Roberts and Gorsuch). Biden needs to  expand the supreme court. Don't say it loud right now. Don't want to energize the right!

8 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

they could just rewrite the election rules after the nominee is selected. Then when it is challenged in the court, because of the conservative majority in th Supreme Court, the change could stand.

 

 

Not happening.  Roberts won't do it, and I don't think neither would Kavanaugh or Gorsuch.  The other conservative justices are pure scum though.