So is Osama Bin Laden next????

Suprise,suprise. The liberal media got hung out to dry on their last minute efforts to sway this election.

1) CBS fraudulent story about Bush's guard service.

2) Weapon depot gone missing, but wait......that news is older than the war itself.

While the Dems continue to trip over their collective sh!t piles they create, what do the Republicans have in store?

Anyone think Osama is in a small jail cell somewhere in Afghanistan?

I do!!

I hope so, but damn, if that is true, what are we waiting for? There is only one week left

Frankly, the Republicans aren't that concerned with OBL. Come to think of it they're not that concerned about weapons getting into the hands of terrorists. How many hundreds of tons did they just let walk away. How many trips would it have taken to haul that stuff away in their pintos? Yes, it's oldish news, but it certainly is relevant to the defense of our people in Iraq. They're being killed with weapons we chose not to guard or blow up.

You mean the weapons that werent there when we got there? That "huge" amount is less than 1 percent of the hundreds of thousands of tons that Saddam possessed. The majority of which we have confiscated and destroyed or are destroying.

This Liberal hit piece is flawed at it's base (like most of them) because it tries to blame the President for losing something, when in fact, it was never their to begin with.

But even more to the point, this illustrates how deadly Saddam was and how large his ability to harm us could be.

Yet the Liberals continue to want it both ways. In their mind, Saddam was not a threat, except for times like this when it benefits their agenda.

Originally posted by Burgold

Frankly, the Republicans aren't that concerned with OBL. Come to think of it they're not that concerned about weapons getting into the hands of terrorists. How many hundreds of tons did they just let walk away. How many trips would it have taken to haul that stuff away in their pintos? Yes, it's oldish news, but it certainly is relevant to the defense of our people in Iraq. They're being killed with weapons we chose not to guard or blow up.

It would be 36 truckloads..

it would blend in nicely with the 40000 truckloads we've destroyed so far...

Nice huh

Burgold, you're reaching!

Wait, Iraq had a millitary, right? So what's the big suprise that they had conventional weapons and explosives?

The fact that they are missing doesn't make the case to invade Iraq any greater? It means that the security has been pretty crappy. I guess either side can spin it to their advantage.