fpickering Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 40 times = Overrated. I watched the NFL network where this was said by NFL Coaches and scouts and there was also a segment about this on sports radio. A perfect example of the above paradigm is Anquan Boldin whose stock fell after he ran a disappointing 40. Did you see what he did his rookie season? Every time Mike Williams stepped on the field he was the focus of the entire game with only one exception and that is when he shared the focus with Larry Fitzgerald. This guy is going to be a star. The only reason I would say we should stay away from him is if he is a head case. If not and he is available then we have to draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJWatson3 Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 BPA. i can't believe so many people would pick mike williams over braylon edwards. did anybody watch college football last year? won't matter because Edwards won't make it out of the top-5. if Mike Williams is there at #9 i'd draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Rolle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Originally posted by convince I say trade down pick a 2nd (from #9 to {15-20}) and/or 3rd (from #9 to {21-32}) In the first I say select Carlos Rodgers or Eramus James, In the second select, Roddy White, V. Jackson, Matt Jones, in the Best available CB, or DE :yes: Trade down + Rogers = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Originally posted by Shotgunner It now looks like Williams may be a top 5 pick, so he won't be available. The best player available makes the most sense.:2cents: Here Here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 waca waca waca waca waca waca waca..........NOT. As much as we may need a CB, we shouldn't draft Pac Man at # 9. As I've said, the best player available, but to chose one I'd have to say Erasmus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangstaSkinz Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Williams if he is available. We still have a stud CB in Springs so I hope we trade down or take a DE at #9. We can address WR or a CB in the third round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkaD Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I find it hard to believe that Rolle is right there with Edwards for 2nd place in votes. That is really surprising to me since our need at CB is nowhere near our need at WR. Hmm... I guess alot of people think our corners right now aren't going to be adequate for us next year. Hmm. Lates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lightskins Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I chose Mike Williams because we need a Go to Guy. Every team has one, even the Patriots (Deion Branch). I also chose Williams because Carlos Rodgers was not included on the list. If he was on the list then i would say go Carlos and then try to get a Louisville Cardinal like Branck in Russell i believe is his last name or that man beast Vincent Jackson out of Northern Colorado...6'5 240 4.5 he is destined to be a Pro Bowler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkaD Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 What team does Carlos play for? When is he projected to go in the draft? Lates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.