88Comrade2000 Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by skinamatic What happens when Kerry puts his adds out that damage Bush? Isn't he skiing and raising money adn then having some big confact this weekend with Don Clinton, Donwanabee Carter and Al Gore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BondiHarry Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Some of us who vote find moral clarity attractive in a candidate. Kerry opposes privatizing Social Security (when privatizing it is the economically wise and moral thing to do), opposes free trade (despite his faults, Bill Clinton basically supported free trade and that helped our economy), does not understand the nature of the war on terrorism (we can't win this war unless we can convince state sponsors of terrorism to stop sponsoring the terrorists ... after taking down Saddam they are starting to take note in places like Libya) and doesn't understand that cutting marginal tax rates does spur economic activity. Kerry seems intent on positioning himself on both sides of an issue so he has all the bases covered. Sorry, but that doesn't work for me. At the risk of sounding like an election nazi... no vote for Kerry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 not cool to position oneself on both sides of an issue. one thing ive always found interesting about republicans is that they are pretty obvious with where they stand and make it known when they do something. I wish the democrats were like that, they all are a buncha pussies who sit around blaming people and not doing a thing about it. An ultra left-wing person like Kerry will probably soon break out with his political ads, this election is going to be bloody. By the way, Tlusby, are you calling Bush a socialist, cause thats fairly unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Zen-like Todd There is nothing vague about the implication. It is logically consistent, and completely evident. You are simply trying to change the subject in order to engage on a debate in different terms instead of admitting the ridiculousness of your statement. I'm not going to bail you out. Sorry. Nothing vague beisdes the fact it is lacking a position statement and reasoning to back it up. Interesting how you are still completely incapable of posting something to back up your position that Guliani was popular enough to defeat Sen Clinton at a time when his claim to fame was adultery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Destino Nothing vague beisdes the fact it is lacking a position statement and reasoning to back it up. Interesting how you are still completely incapable of posting something to back up your position that Guliani was popular enough to defeat Sen Clinton at a time when his claim to fame was adultery. What position? I didn't take a position. That has nothing to do with my statement. You are still pathetically, desperately trying to change the subject? Either way, this is making you look terrible. Each post is less coherent, and more desperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Zen-like Todd What position? I didn't take a position. That has nothing to do with my statement. You are still pathetically, desperately trying to change the subject? Either way, this is making you look terrible. Each post is less coherent, and more desperate. Stating "you are trying to change the subject" over and over againg isn't going to make it true. You responded to my statement concerning Guliani and I restated that position so if anything Todd you are the one that no longer wishes to stay on topic. As for desperate, you've reached the point now where you refuse to discuss the topic and when given the chance to state your position you failed to do so. Either you're a coward or you really have nothing to add and seek to hide that truth by substituting weak insults for valid points. Either state your position and reasoning behind it or go find a teenage message board where posting non stop nothing is the norm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Destino Stating "you are trying to change the subject" over and over againg isn't going to make it true. You responded to my statement concerning Guliani and I restated that position so if anything Todd you are the one that no longer wishes to stay on topic. As for desperate, you've reached the point now where you refuse to discuss the topic and when given the chance to state your position you failed to do so. Either you're a coward or you really have nothing to add and seek to hide that truth by substituting weak insults for valid points. Either state your position and reasoning behind it or go find a teenage message board where posting non stop nothing is the norm. BWAHAHAHAHAAHA You never dealt with the original statement. You tried to change the subject, and have continued to do so, in a pathetic attempt to save your dignity, and in doing so, have made yourself look a thousand times worse. You can carry on all you want like a whiney troll, but it does not change the reality of the situation. It is absurd for a troll who does nothing but post streams of horribly structured unsupportable, one-sided insults to attempt to call into question the posting of others on this board. You garner no respect from the board, and you won't until your posts begin to contain some small level of logical consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashback Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Well. Someone might have to change their name back to "Cranky" after this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Zen-like Todd BWAHAHAHAHAAHA You never dealt with the original statement. You tried to change the subject, and have continued to do so, in a pathetic attempt to save your dignity, and in doing so, have made yourself look a thousand times worse. You can carry on all you want like a whiney troll, but it does not change the reality of the situation. It is absurd for a troll who does nothing but post streams of horribly structured unsupportable, one-sided insults to attempt to call into question the posting of others on this board. You garner no respect from the board, and you won't until your posts begin to contain some small level of logical consistency. Your original statement wasn't a argument it was a vapid insult. I asked you to state your position you refused. As for calling me a troll? Spare me the crap until you can actually grow a pair and state your own position instead of taking the cowards route and seeking to only focus on someone elses. I'm calling you out, state your position or stfu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Destino Your original statement wasn't a argument it was a vapid insult. I asked you to state your position you refused. As for calling me a troll? Spare me the crap until you can actually grow a pair and state your own position instead of taking the cowards route and seeking to only focus on someone elses. BTW - nice touch with the high school peer pressure attack, pretending you speak for the board. You're a moron and I'm calling you out, state your position or stfu. Never has Art's favorite phrase "tilting at windmills" seemed so appropriate. There's nothing for you to call out. You can't even hold yourself accountable for your statements, so what ground to you have to do the same for others? Its simply not going to work. And nice hypocrisy, by the way. Who was the one who threw out the absurd teenage message board comment? Have you looked at your own posts lately? Completely devoid of rational discourse. You were called out, you couldn't deal with it, and You are in fact the one taking the coward's route. You think that if you keep replying with silly statements, eventually I'll stop. Its not going to happen. You will just continue to sink further into the depths of desperation, embarassment, and frustration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 Originally posted by Zen-like Todd Never has Art's favorite phrase "tilting at windmills" seemed so appropriate. There's nothing for you to call out. You can't even hold yourself accountable for your statements, so what ground to you have to do the same for others? Its simply not going to work. And nice hypocrisy, by the way. Who was the one who threw out the absurd teenage message board comment? Have you looked at your own posts lately? Completely devoid of rational discourse. You were called out, you couldn't deal with it, and You are in fact the one taking the coward's route. You think that if you keep replying with silly statements, eventually I'll stop. Its not going to happen. You will just continue to sink further into the depths of desperation, embarassment, and frustration. I stand by my original statement and you've offered nothing to disprove it. Now I've asked you to do so and state your position and you haven't. So continue to pretend you speak for the forum and continue to hurl insults but in truth you're just another fool with nothing to say. I stand by my statement that Hilary would have defeated a pre-9/11 Guliani as he was at the time being killed in the press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted March 27, 2004 Share Posted March 27, 2004 Originally posted by Destino I stand by my original statement and you've offered nothing to disprove it. Now I've asked you to do so and state your position and you haven't. So continue to pretend you speak for the forum and continue to hurl insults but in truth you're just another fool with nothing to say. I stand by my statement that Hilary would have defeated a pre-9/11 Guliani as he was at the time being killed in the press. You've got nothing to say, so you keep repeating yourself. You are incapable of defending yourself, so you are desperately searching for ammunition. You need a way, any way, to change the subject. You are flailing away, without the integrity to stay on topic. How can you possibly stand by your original statement? You blatantly professed ignorance, and followed it with a statement of certainty. You were called on it, and instead of facing up to it, decide to act like a whiney brat, to try to drag the debate downwards, off topic, anywhere you possibly can in order to deflect attention from your statement. It hasn't worked so far, and its not going to work now. Its that simple. Your lack of integrity and maturity is on display for all of the forum to see. Congratulations on prolonging your misery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.