tr1 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/12/where-was-roy-williams.html 12:53 PM Mon, Dec 21, 2009 Dallas Cowboys coach Wade Phillips said Roy Williams did not receive a battlefield demotion in the pecking order at wide receiver during Saturday's win at New Orleans. Williams did vanish from the offense after a potentially damaging drop. Running a slant pattern, Williams had inside position on Saints defender Clinton Porter but could not come up with the catch on a third-and-fourth play early in the fourth quarter. Williams did not see the ball again. On the Cowboys next and final full possession, quarterback Tony Romo sits to pee threw to three receivers: Miles Austin, Sam Hurd and John Phillips. Williams finished with only one catch for 14 yards. Romo sits to pee targeted a season-low three passes to Williams. ``We still have hopes that the things we see in practice (from Williams) are going to happen,'' Phillips said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 Can somebody remind me what the pukes gave up for this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTK Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 They gave up a 1st and a 3rd...swapped a 6th for a 5th. Now that I've answered your question, how about answering mine. With the way your team played tonight, why/how could you possibly be thinking about your rival team? Doesn't your team have enough problems for you to worry about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 They gave up a 1st and a 3rd...swapped a 6th for a 5th. Now that I've answered your question, how about answering mine. With the way your team played tonight, why/how could you possibly be thinking about your rival team? Doesn't your team have enough problems for you to worry about? Well, lookie here...another attempt at a hijack. If you'd like to discuss the Skins' game tonight, I'd suggest you visit the Stadium. If you'd like to discuss me, then I win and you lose. Otherwise, let's talk Roy...shall we? I thought the pukes were pretty ineffective on offense when he wasn't in the lineup at the end of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTK Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Well, lookie here...another attempt at a hijack.If you'd like to discuss the Skins' game tonight, I'd suggest you visit the Stadium. If you'd like to discuss me, then I win and you lose. Otherwise, let's talk Roy...shall we? I thought the pukes were pretty ineffective on offense when he wasn't in the lineup at the end of the game. Yes, I agree with you about Roy. I'd rather see Ogletree in there. That drop he had on 3rd down nearly cost us the game. He wasn't worth the picks and he certainly isn't worth his contract, though it's not my money. I am not trying to hijack the thread. I just don't understand how you can even think about another team after the show your team just put on. Seriously. That just proves to me that your hate for Dallas is stronger than your love for your own team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolbeans Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I thought the pukes were pretty ineffective on offense when he wasn't in the lineup at the end of the game. You mean during that final clutch drive by Romo sits to pee where he led the team down for what should have been a game clinching chip shot field goal? That was about as effective as a QB and an offense can be. Did you mean to tpe "effective" or did you just mean to be totally wrong again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 You mean during that final clutch drive by Romo sits to pee where he led the team down for what should have been a game clinching chip shot field goal? That was about as effective as a QB and an offense can be. Did you mean to tpe "effective" or did you just mean to be totally wrong again? No, on the three and outs when he wasn't on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 I am not trying to hijack the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTK Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Is that all you've got? Smileys? I answered your question and talked about Roy. Although I did misread your post because I thought you were talking about when Roy was in the game. The offense is much more effective in my opinion when Roy is not in the game because he and Romo sits to pee are seldom on the same page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTK Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 No, on the three and outs when he wasn't on the field. :doh: Dallas had ONE three and out the entire game against the Saints. Guess who dropped the pass that would have gave them a first down and prevented the three and out? This is easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwdj75 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 You drop sure catches, the QB will look elsewhere. Bottom line. The good thing is Dallas doesn't have to rely on Williams, there are other players who have gladly taken up the slack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 No, on the three and outs when he wasn't on the field. Dude, you just embarrassed yourself. There was no 3 and out once he was left the field. His drop was the only reason there was a 3 and out at all. EPIC, EPIC FAIL! What an awful argument.:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 :doh:Dallas had ONE three and out the entire game against the Saints. Guess who dropped the pass that would have gave them a first down and prevented the three and out? This is easy. My memory failed me. You're right. The three and out happened before Roy left the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTK Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 My memory failed me. You're right. The three and out happened before Roy left the game. That's cool, I understand you're having a rough night. But I really don't think Roy actually "left the game". It's just part of the sub package. Hurd comes in a lot on running downs. I was just as surprised as the Saints were when we threw the ball to him. I think it's his first target since the Denver game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 What kind of thread is this? You're saying Roy sucks. There isn't a cowboy fan in the country that would disagree with you. Good thread. Tomorrow start one that claims the sky is blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbieac Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 The good thing is Dallas doesn't have to rely on Williams, there are other players who have gladly taken up the slack. It's nice to have one of if not THE best receiver in the division in Austin to pick up the slack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esloan Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I think, possibly, that this is the most fail thread I have ever seen posted. Yes, Roy Williams sucks. Yes, we know he sucks. Yes, I would rather have Ogletree or Crayton or almost anyone else (except for Terrell Owens ) starting opposite Miles Austin. Anymore questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbieac Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I think, possibly, that this is the most fail thread I have ever seen posted.Yes, Roy Williams sucks. Yes, we know he sucks. Yes, I would rather have Ogletree or Crayton or almost anyone else (except for Terrell Owens ) starting opposite Roy Williams. Anymore questions? Did you see who the thread starter was? FAIL threads are what he specializes in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 My memory failed me. You're right. The three and out happened before Roy left the game. Respect for owning up! It's an easy mistake to make. But the fact remains, I feel the Cowboys are better off with Roy off the field. He is an absolute cancer to offensive production. The Cowboys are much better off with Crayton as the #2. RW has been an epic failure. Gotta say you were right about that one tr1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Aside from the OP trying to get a rise out of y'all, why isn't Ogletree been given a chance? I guess it's all down to what you gave up for Williams, and the size of his contract, but one things for sure, the rook sure does look like he's gona' be a competent pro, and he has great hands from what I've seen. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 What kind of thread is this?You're saying Roy sucks. :hysterical: tr1 did say anything, he posted an Article written by a Dallas Morning News writer yet since it was posted we have had numerous poke fans post, to do nothing but attack the poster... only 3 made any attempt to discuss the article, and 1 had to make a reference about the Redskins poor play, in an attempt to chastise tr1. yet in another thread there were dozen of posts pointing fingers at tr1, myself and others, bringing down the ATN, preventing intelligent discussions..... yadda yadda yadda. Several of those .... complaining are in this thread yet not one attempt to talk intelligently about the article. 1. you don't like the thread op, blame the DMN writer, talk about kill the messenger 2. If tr1 posting the thread bothers you, then why bother reading it, or responding in it. Stop coming to a Redskin board if articles pointing out flaws in the pokes Armour makes you upset. You don't think there threads laughing at the Skins on CZ right now? Articles about the blowout loss? I would be a FOOL to go there whining about them being posted. It's what rival fans do for goodness sakes. :doh: 3. The only "fail" is the responses.... unnecessary, and only promotes the bull **** many of you professes to detest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsunoles0021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Aside from the OP trying to get a rise out of y'all, why isn't Ogletree been given a chance?I guess it's all down to what you gave up for Williams, and the size of his contract, but one things for sure, the rook sure does look like he's gona' be a competent pro, and he has great hands from what I've seen. Hail. You're exactly right. It's Jerry and everyone else being stubborn and not wanting to give up on something that they sacrificed so much for. It's time to chalk it up as a loss and accept he's just not good. The sooner everyone accepts that, the better. Crayton or Ogletree can easily make those catches that Roy is putting on the turf on a weekly basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeroburrito Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 he was dropping balls killing drives. i think he caused our only 3 and out. ogletree isn't given a chance because the staff doesn't believe in playing rookies unless absolutely necessary. i hope they all get fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Can somebody remind me what the pukes gave up for this guy? too much :mad: i was so wrong about this guy....I really wish i wasnt, but i was! Good thing Dallas has Miles Austin, he is the one that got the production everyone thought they'd miss after losing T.O..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbigdog123 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Cowboys staff should have filed missing persons report because he did disappeared during the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.