Ax Posted June 3, 2003 Share Posted June 3, 2003 from Code, but I would rather have 10 guilty guys go free than have 1 innocent guy go to jail. And then if one of them later, a) killed your Mom, raped your wife, or c) molested your child, you would say what? Doubt can be found by anyone looking for it. As can guilt. In trying to seek the TRUTH, I am convinced he did it. Therefore I would have found him guilty. And would have voted for the death penalty if it would have been up to the jury. His jury wanted to find reasonable doubt. So they did. But that's just my opinion, and we all no what they're like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Posted June 3, 2003 Share Posted June 3, 2003 The best debunking of the police conspiracy theory against OJ came from Vincent Bugliosi's book (title escapes me). Bugliosi also made the case - a very convincing one BTW - that even if you ignore all of the supposedly tainted blood evidence, there still in fact was a mountain of evidence against OJ such that he should have been found guilty beyond reasonable doubt. OJ is guilty, and should have been found guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codeorama Posted June 3, 2003 Share Posted June 3, 2003 Ax, so by your reasoning, you would rather serve a life sentance for a crime you did not commit so long as other questionable criminals are locked up.:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.