Skins4ever1 Posted April 20, 2008 Author Share Posted April 20, 2008 It is ridiculous, isn't it?Back in February there were 6-10 receivers, none of whom separated themselves from the pack or warranted a high pick. Now all of a sudden Devin Thomas is supposedly a better player than any of the others and clearly warrants a top 20 pick. I wonder if the GMs realize that no one has played a real football game in the time that all this change took place. I'll be very, very upset if they pick Thomas. They should take a receiver in the 2nd round, first round should be BPA between OL, CB, or DE. Why would the giggles take another DE when they haven't even seen what last years 2nd round pick can do? Plus they just signed Clemons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWUeagleMD Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Why would the giggles take another DE when they haven't even seen what last years 2nd round pick can do? Plus they just signed Clemons. Why would the Giants draft Mathias Kiwanuka after already scoring big time with Osi Umenyiora and Justin Tuck and while still holding the rights to Hall of Famer Michael Strahan? You can never have enough DEs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboysSaintsFan Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 He had a really good season and appears to be everything they thought he was when they drafted him. I think the poster was being sarcastic-pt being that when you have all but solidified that interior for many more years to come, then what's the point in trading for another DT who's due some $18m over the next 2 years AND has a knee problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboysSaintsFan Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Why would the Giants draft Mathias Kiwanuka after already scoring big time with Osi Umenyiora and Justin Tuck and while still holding the rights to Hall of Famer Michael Strahan?You can never have enough DEs. Does't Kiwi play LB now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWUeagleMD Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Does't Kiwi play LB now? Yes. He's a SAM now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWUeagleMD Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 I think the poster was being sarcastic-pt being that when you have all but solidified that interior for many more years to come, then what's the point in trading for another DT who's due some $18m over the next 2 years AND has a knee problem? His point was mainly that Bunkley isn't as good as Eagles fans (one in particular) made him out to be. To your point: they clearly wouldn't trade for him without redoing his deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 Yes. He's a SAM now.And actually played surprisingly well in that role.His point was mainly that Bunkley isn't as good as Eagles fans (one in particular) made him out to be.Huh.......What fetish of pictures of shirtless muscle-bound guys in his sig Eagle fan could you be speaking of?:whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.