skinsrbeast Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 when we get in the redzone or in 3rd down situation, those are easy, we have our possesion reciever..... NOT. Where is our possesion reciever? We lost Gardner and Mccants (2 semi-tall possesion recievers) and gained, no doubtably better wide recievers, but these wide recievers are hard to fit in a system. With no tall threat, and no posesion guy, how do we get those up for grabs redzone catches, or those sideline grabs. I like all the wide-recievers we have but think about it, we have moss, lloyd, randel-el, patten, and thrash. Which one of those is considered our possesion reciever. Now don't get me wrong i have all the faith for the skins, but if you go back to the Spurrior 2003 year, and the Gibbs 2004 (all bad seasons, but beside the point) Coles wold get all the yards, but in the end, Dannarien Mccants(6) and Rod Gardner(5) got all the touchdowns in 2003. And in 2004, coles again got most the yardage, but Cooley had 6 TD's Gardner had 5 Td's yet again, and Robert Royal had 4 TD's. Now i still believe the redskins will win the superbowl, but do you think that with the element of a possesion reciever gone, the redskins, will have to work new schemes, and trades to get one. Or will Cooley/Fauria emerge as our redzone and possesion guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
909997 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 possesion WR's cant take a 2 yard pass for a first down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Redskin Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Sellars had 7tds last year and cooley had about the same. They seemed to be our main redzone targets last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 a possession wr cant take a slip screen to the house.. we got our possession reciever.. his name is santana moss. our redzone threat is clinton portis.. a joe gibbs football teams needs a bruiser and then a occassionaly bootleg by the qb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeysc23 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Sellers is beast in the RZ. Id take him and Cooley not to mention we could line up with 4 wideouts and have plenty of options even if they are not too tall. Also Lloyd has shown he will go up and get the ball. And should those fail we have CP and Duckett to bruise it on it. Lets just hope to be there so many times we have this problem Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rook Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Gardner and Mccants? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Sellers and Cooley! :helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REEGSKINS Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 loyd,cooley and sellars are poss recievers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranchiseTY11 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Cooley and Sellers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txskins Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 How tall is Lloyd? I think he was brought in to be that guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeysc23 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 How tall is Lloyd? I think he was brought in to be that guy? He is listed at 6' Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Did anyone see that awesome catch Lloyd made on that pass that Brunnell was roughed on? This guy has got a knack for making tough receptions...he needs to get some more balls thrown his way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SantanaClaus89 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 He is listed at 6'Scott Yes, but Lloyd has great extension and can really get up and go after the ball.. Lloyd is the possesion WR.. you dont have to be plaxico burress' height to be a possesion WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeysc23 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Yes, but Lloyd has great extension and can really get up and go after the ball.. Lloyd is the possesion WR.. you dont have to be plaxico burress' height to be a possesion WR Oh I dont disagree just answering the question. Lloyd has ups and if you do a youtube search or google you can see some of the amazing catches he has had in his career. Hopefully many more to come. Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins84 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 ??? Obviously it's Brandon Lloyd.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SantanaClaus89 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Oh I dont disagree just answering the question. Lloyd has ups and if you do a youtube search or google you can see some of the amazing catches he has had in his career. Hopefully many more to come.Scott Oh yeah, I've seen all those circus catches he's made... Makes me really excited hopefully they'll start to get some more passes thrown his way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.