altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 "If the president says 'We made mistakes,' fine, let's move on," said Rep. Michael E. Capuano (D-Mass.). "But if he lied to get America into a war, I can't imagine anything more impeachable." Full Story at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/24/AR2006032402248.html Really...if the Repubs can go for impeachment over "misconduct", then why not lieing to go to war? The latter is far more reprehensible to my mind. This may also explain why the Bush shills have been astroturfing here so much lately....more and more people agree that it is time to rid this nation of the Plague of the Bush Family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamingwolf Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 if they are going to do it, this is the time I would pick for my most favored result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Let' s see... an article written by a liberal "journalist", published by an agenda-driven left-wing rag, and everyone quoted in the article is from a liberal northeastern state or a Democratic congressman. And what a bunch of hypocrites. Of course, no support from these empty souls when Klinton was impeached for LYING to the American people UNDER OATH and on TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Was this ghost-written by the guy at ABC "news" that said Bush made him sick? Please Dems, please. Go ahead. Make our day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSpirit Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Let' s see... an article written by a liberal "journalist", published by an agenda-driven left-wing rag, and everyone quoted in the article is from a liberal northeastern state or a Democratic congressman. And what a bunch of hypocrites. Of course, no support from these empty souls when Klinton was impeached for LYING to the American people UNDER OATH and on TV. Well, nobody died because of Clinton's lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Well, nobody died because of Clinton's lies. I think some Serbs would disagree with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Well, nobody died because of Clinton's lies. First, you need to prove that Bush has lied about Iraq II. You can't, so don't bother responding with the typical drivel. Secondly, LYING UNDER OATH is a crime AND that has been proven. Put that in your bong and smoke it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 And what a bunch of hypocrites. Of course, no support from these empty souls when Klinton was impeached for LYING to the American people UNDER OATH and on TV. Let me get this straight. Lying about a sexual dalliance is the same order of magnitude as lying about WMD to the world, and then sending other peoples children to war to die? These Karing Kompassionate Kristians really have their priorities straight. Make War, not Love......:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Let me get this straight. Lying about a sexual dalliance is the same order of magnitude as lying about WMD to the world, and then sending other peoples children to war to die?These Karing Kompassionate Kristians really have their priorities straight. Make War, not Love......:doh: Lying is lying. It's against the law when you're under oath. And you might want to wait for ABC to finish publishing the Saddam papers before you talk about WMD's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Let me get this straight. Lying about a sexual dalliance is the same order of magnitude as lying about WMD to the world, and then sending other peoples children to war to die?These Karing Kompassionate Kristians really have their priorities straight. Make War, not Love......:doh: See the last post. One is a far-flung left-wing inspired theory. The other is a FACT. Is lying uder oath a crime or not? It is, and it's called perjury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSpirit Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I think some Serbs would disagree with that Serbs were killed as a result of Bill getting a BJ? First, you need to prove that Bush has lied about Iraq II. You can't, so don't bother responding with the typical drivel. Secondly, LYING UNDER OATH is a crime AND that has been proven. Put that in your bong and smoke it. OK, while I take my toke, can you tell me what Iraq and Saddam had to do with 9/11? And where are the WMD's? What was the threat again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 Lying is lying. It's against the law when you're under oath.And you might want to wait for ABC to finish publishing the Saddam papers before you talk about WMD's So your position is that if you lie, not under oath it is a lesser crime, even if other people are dieing because of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Serbs were killed as a result of Bill getting a BJ?OK, while I take my toke, can you tell me what Iraq and Saddam had to do with 9/11? And where are the WMD's? What was the threat again? There's another thread on this already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 So your position is that if you lie, not under oath it is a lesser crime, even if other people are dieing because of it? He was under oath; it's perjury. Forget about the context because it's simply not relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Ok. I'm taking bets. Over/Under on the responses to this thread? 148. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Let me get this straight. Lying about a sexual dalliance is the same order of magnitude as lying about WMD to the world, and then sending other peoples children to war to die?These Karing Kompassionate Kristians really have their priorities straight. Make War, not Love......:doh: Why does this have to turn into a Christian thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 See the last post. One is a far-flung left-wing inspired theory. The other is a FACT. Is lying uder oath a crime or not? It is, and it's called perjury. Theory? Lying about the WMD is the least if this administrations crimes. Exposing CIA personnel, mis=appropriating BILLIONS of dollars unaccounted for, giving no-bid contracts to corporations that admin members are ex-board members of, etc, etc. They all need to be tried for treason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Why does this have to turn into a Christian thing? It's what they do, Jimmi. It's just what they do. Laugh and move on with life. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 He was under oath; it's perjury. Forget about the context because it's simply not relevant. Sorry man, the blood doesn't wash off that easy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Theory? Lying about the WMD is the least if this administrations crimes. Exposing CIA personnel, mis=appropriating BILLIONS of dollars unaccounted for, giving no-bid contracts to corporations that admin members are ex-board members of, etc, etc. They all need to be tried for treason... Sir, you have no basis in fact for your infantile assertions. You echo the rhetoric of your fathers and their ilk such as International Answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 So your position is that if you lie, not under oath it is a lesser crime, even if other people are dieing because of it? Provide proof he lied, then you can say it. Keep in mind, I saw photos before I went into Iraq. I'm still here, three years later, saying the Iraqi's were moving something out of known WMD bunkers before the war. ABC is about to vindicate me, as they have Mad Mike with the Saddam/Bin Laden connection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 Why does this have to turn into a Christian thing? It isnt. I said Kristian...and that was in reply to the "Klinton" remark. They seek to justify their lies by pointing to some one elses mis-deeds. Not a sign of a responsible viewpoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Nm.........................I'm going to go try and talk a wall out of blocking my path. Think I'll have better luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 It isnt. I said Kristian...and that was in reply to the "Klinton" remark. They seek to justify their lies by pointing to some one elses mis-deeds. Not a sign of a responsible viewpoint. No be chump and run from what you said - no matter how you spell it you said what you meant - Christians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted March 25, 2006 Author Share Posted March 25, 2006 His man Colin Powell, in front of the whole world at the UN stated they had WMD, and brought up the bogus mobile anthrax busses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.