redskinfansince73 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I like Givens and Randell El ! Jurevicious would make a great possession receiver,but I agree the age and money would be tuff. HTTR!:helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazhog Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Brandon Stokley... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedzoneHunter Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 i think san fran will likely match on lloyd. although they do have a lot of free agents to worry about Don't forget that we have Snyder signing the checks here. He likes to dangle a huge signing bonus in the competitions face, usually a figure the other team is afraid of. He can then spread it out over 5 or 6 years. Brandon Lloyd is the way to go, bar none! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1SkinsFan Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Still no one is mentioning Antonio Bryant. He played in two horrible offenses but has the freakish athletic ability to be the perfect compliment to Moss. agreed. He is young and proved this season he can be a #1 or #2 reciver. Anytime you have over 1000 yds recieving with Carlie Frye and Trent Dilfer at QB, and you play for the Browns, I dont care if you are a former cowboy, you deserve a chance on a good team. I would take either Koren Robinson b/c of his size, kick and punt return skills, and hands. Or Antonio Bryant b/c of his size, possession and talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReefa Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Also, everyone says the Skins need size. But if you look at the Chiefs (where the brand new offensive coordinator coached last year) none of their receivers had "size." Also the Rams have a pretty successful offense without a "big" receiver. The Chiefs "possession receiver" was Tony Gonzalez, who is 6-5, 250. Now, Cooley is pretty big, too (6'3), but he is not the kind of player who can be a main receiving option. At least he hasn't yet proven that he can be. If Cooley can be the same type of player as a Tony Gonzalez, then you're right, we don't need a big second receiver. I'm not sure that that is a realistic appraisal of Cooley's physical talents, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twenty-eight Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 • Make no mistake: Free agent-to-be Jurevicius would just as soon stay put. "I love Seattle," the wide receiver told PFW at the Super Bowl. "I'll do anything I have to to win. I don't care if [i'm] catching 10 [passes] a game or none. This is a good, close group of guys." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReefa Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 how far has freddie fallen? he is being asked toplay in the areana league ?? and to play defense, no less, as well. boy did he ever get his comeuppence Far be it for me to defend Freddie Mitchell, but pretty much everyone who plays in the Arena League plays both ways. I think two of the players on each side of the ball are allowed to be one way specialists, and that's it. And one of those is the QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoyaSkins28 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I love Randle El, but he's too similar to Moss and Patten. We need size. Of these, I'd probably go with Givens. I agree we need a guy with size, but not that much size. I think Randle El is the best choice (aside Reggie Wayne who probably won't leave Indy) because if we have three fast, explosive recievers, the secondary is going to worry about covering deep which leaves Clinton Portis with 5-6 guys in the box. He can easily get past that for a big play. If we get Randle El, expect Portis to have a huge year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.