schmitty199 Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 blah, blah, blah...bottom line Al Saunders > Chris Palmer pretty sure thats the worst comparison ive ever seen..... considering palmer is dallas QB coach not OC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 Hey young cheezy, he isnt even going to be the O-Coordinator, hes going to be the QBs coach. And, again, who's the better offensive mind, Saunders or Palmer. Why is the question so difficult for you boys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schmitty199 Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 And, again, who's the better offensive mind, Saunders or Palmer. Why is the question so difficult for you boys? easily saunders... now whos a better QB coach? no clue doesnt really matter alot two different jobs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaDRoc Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 Saunders was brought in to run the Redskins O because gibbs needed help. Parcells doesn't Parcells could have used some offensive help in both Skins/Dallas games this season. 13 and then 7 pts?? While Gibbs had 14 and 35?? It also could be that Gibbs has the ability to put aside his ego to improve his team for the better while Parcells cannot. IMO Parcells is a good coach, I'm just refuting ur statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 And, again, who's the better offensive mind, Saunders or Palmer. Why is the question so difficult for you boys? The question isn't difficult its stupid. Whos the better offensive mind the guy who has run the best offense in the NFL in KC, or the QB coach in Dallas? hmmmm come on Art do you seriously need the approval of Cowboys fans so much that you ask such an obvious question? Now a better questio0n is do you think the Redskins have the talent of the KC Offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted January 31, 2006 Share Posted January 31, 2006 Parcells could have used some offensive help in both Skins/Dallas games this season. 13 and then 7 pts??While Gibbs had 14 and 35?? It also could be that Gibbs has the ability to put aside his ego to improve his team for the better while Parcells cannot. IMO Parcells is a good coach, I'm just refuting ur statement. Are you saying the Redskins defense isn't good? because I blame your defense for the bad showing of our offense. Gibbs offense has been uninspiring since he came back, he went and got someone to run it for him. Sure he put his ego aside, because he knew he had to to try and take the next step. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.