Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

El Mexican

Members
  • Posts

    642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by El Mexican

  1. On 5/29/2024 at 7:00 AM, BringMetheHeadofBruceAllen said:

     

    You're not crazy...

     

    shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcQnCpqg2OzmEkIgnN_8h

     

    In fact, that's what many here on this board initially thought of when it was rolled out! But that's what happens when the owner lets his wife design the identity of the team...

     

    Ouch. This team needs a re-re-branding.

     

    At least those terrible seasons of the past were watchable thanks to the awesome unis we had.

     

    If I'm investing three hours of my time I expect the actual object on my screen be pleasing.

    The actual play quality of the team is another discussion completely.

     

    • Like 2
  2. On 5/17/2024 at 3:07 PM, bentskin said:

    While I was / am looking forward to a rebrand I did expect it to be more refresh and less rebrand like we got. Be careful what you wish for? No kidding.

    I was hoping to see them go back to a more 60's style and coloring, I thought that made sense. Anyway, as bad and horrid as the new unis are I really dont understand why they cant or wont simply use this, actually the '20-'22 version with WASHINGTON on the front so as to offend with the current helmet. It is already authorized as a throwback and would appease practically all of the fan base until a permanent solution can be redesigned. And give us more W only gear since most dont want to acknowledge the C word. 

    Tongue in cheek - Cleveland can be the Browns, can Washington be the Wetzels and return to the old logo? 

    Personally, if the old logo were to make a return about the only name that could work is Warriors but I stilll think Redwolves is the best second choice. Sentinels works for me if they would go all in with a Spartan style spear on the helmet a la 60's unis replacing the feather with a yellow ribbon. 

    I have also seen a really nice Michigan Wolverine style helmet that would work with any name that I could get behind. It looks more like a W wrapped over the helmet with a spear / arrow head "ghosted" in on the front. 

    If Kraken and Valkyrie are acceptable are we opposed to Werewolves? Not better than Redwolves in my opinion but if there is serious opposition to using the word Red in the name it certainly solves that problem while keeping the wolves theme in tact. 

     

    Bryan Flynn @brydfly

    image.png.dd0046f3d1e08a04f64d601da3058089.png    

     

    Did this right quick. Would look better with more time on a better model, but it gives you an idea. pic.twitter.com/RYv2GxqZlf

    — Bryan Flynn (@brydfly) April 25, 2024

     

    HTTR

     

    You said bro, I can't even begin to understand why would anyone mess with the color combination we already had.

    It just looks so damn good. 

     

    NO ONE wanted to change in colors or design (logo and names are another subject). It was a mistake and the current front office should take note.

     

    Bring back the unis Josh!

     

     

     

  3. 15 hours ago, FuriousD said:

    Hear, hear!

    The sh** storm of the last 30 years isn’t going to be reversed overnight but the team is finally moving in the right direction and patience is key here. 
     

    PS: the Debbie Downers need a f*ckin slap upside the head! We’ve come so far in such a short time and we can see the light. 

     

    Not DD, we're just realists.

     

    It's a brutal league and we still have some huge needs at key positions (OL for starters). And we'll be starting a rookie QB.

     

    Hope springs eternal I guess...

  4. I expect basic competency and that's about it.

     

    That will be enough for a 6-11 season.

     

    I also expect:

     

    - Jayden getting hurt at midseason. He'll want to tuck the ball and run due to the change of pace of the NFL.

    - A struggling offensive line

    - Defense will be solid

    - We will win more games at home, at notable change from the previous seasons.

     

    That's about it.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. Emmmm, why did the O-Line get neglected in the draft?

     

    I'm starting to guess the new regime blames last year's pathetic O-Line showing on RR and Howell. 

     

    No other way around it. We're rolling with most of last year's unit except we added Biadasz and Allegretti, right?  

     

    Daniels better start packing some protein milkshakes.

    • Thumb up 1
  6. 19 minutes ago, clskinsfan said:

    Agree. And I imagine that is what they are going to work hard on with him once he gets into the building. I understand why he did it. It let him protect the ball. But in the NFL it is more important that he protects his body. A couple of picks are fine if it keeps him healthy. 

     

    Let's just be realistic for a second.

    Most rookie QBs struggle with their transition to the NFL and cover their inefficiencies by running or improvising a play.

     

    JD will also tend to do this.

     

    Problem for him is his wirey frame. Even if he has some great passing ability the chances of being hurt are VERY high if and when he runs. And he WILL run a whole lot just to "make things happen" and try to become the next Mahomes.

     

    It's time we settle down and draft a "pure" passer like McCarthy plus some AAA starters in the O-Line. Don't try to re-invent the wheel! 

    • Like 2
    • Thumb down 1
  7. 1 hour ago, OtisDriftwood25 said:

    People say JD reminds them of Cunningham.

     

    Really? Only if you look at the numbers on a spreadsheet regarding weight and height.

     

    Randall was incredibly tough and had freakishly long legs.

    Once he got going he was very hard to bring down even by historically good defenses in the NFC East.

     

    It's the first time I ever hear JD being compared to him.

  8. 14 minutes ago, mistertim said:

     

    IMO this should be updated to say "slim QBs who also run a lot"

     

    Cousins is pretty slim, but he's a pure pocket passer.

     

    Dude looks like a tank compared to Daniels, though. Frame just looks bulkier.

    26 minutes ago, ST_DaGoat21 said:

    Honestly at this point I hope they just draft Daniels so I can stop torturing myself rooting for this team every week.  

     

    Or how about they surprise us for the good once in a generation and draft McCarthy.

  9. 12 hours ago, SkinsFTW said:

    But what if McCarthy is really the next Tom Brady?

     

    Nobody knows. It's actually slightly possible. I'd give it a 10% chance that he's even 50% as clutch as Tom Brady.

     

    I think that is more likely than Daniels being a clutch Lamar Jackson.

     

    So I'm going with Maye 1, McCarthy 2 and if they believe he's a better leader and more of a clutch player then it would be better to take McCarthy. Especially if they don't see Maye being clutch at all.

     

    McCarthy is my pick also. He looks legit in every phase, maybe not spectacular in any one in particular, but just very solid all around.

     

    Daniels looks like RGIII Part Deux. I'll pass.

    • Like 1
    • Thumb down 1
    • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 1
  10. 12 hours ago, skinsarethebest said:

     

    if we’re able to get an RG3 who can actually read defenses and stay on his feet, then it’s a different ball game.

     

     

    I mean that's my point bro, there's already one of them already and he plays for the Ravens.

    And exceedingly rare QB that has long surpassed RGIII in any meaningful metric.

     

    That's why I said the safer pick would be just your "normal" NFL QB who can throw and read defenses and that's McCarthy.

    • Like 1
  11. 46 minutes ago, RWJ said:

    If I could pepper this post with "likes" I would.  So, so true!  

     

    I know, right?

     

    The most important draft in decades. Expectation is tremendous.

     

    I get everyone wants JD to be the next Lamar. The FO is prob thinking the same thing.

    And yet the stench of RGIII still hangs heavy in this organization.

     

    Take McCarthy and be done with it. Safer pick.

     

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  12. On 3/26/2024 at 2:36 PM, Est.1974 said:

    Good idea, as we move on through the offseason the OL talk can drift into here…

     

    Absolutely man, until I see some clear improvement with this new group Imma keep remembering every fan that we just finished the worst season in history regarding our O-line.

     

    As someone who saw The Hogs, The younger Hogs, the Pathetic 98 Line, the Two Anchor System (Samuels & Jansen), The Dirtbags, and a bunch of other units who are best forgotten last year's effort is still seared in my eyeballs.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  13. 4 hours ago, RWJ said:

    Also, a freak accident that happened to RG3 too.  Eventually, the system he was running, ala 7 from the 9ers was running caught up to him and would've caught up to RG3 had he stayed healthy but again no slide, you're going to get broke in two just like Daniels, eventually.  It's inevitable, at least to me and it's a shame.  I've explained and posted about Daniels and his frame already so I will stop here. 

     

    i see the same thing.

    Daniels looks way to thin and can't imagine him absorbing a similar amount of hits as RGIII. 

    • Like 1
  14. 3 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

    Which was unfortunately compounded by the issue of Robert not being any good as an NFL passer and having no value outside of read option. I really don’t blame Shanny. The options were to keep running read option, have a chance of winning and hope that Robert might eventually figure out that stepping out of bounds or getting down is a good thing if you keep telling him over and over and over and over again or we pretend like he can play in a traditional style and have no chance of winning and he is also getting his ass destroyed in the pocket because he looks like one of those big inflatable guys outside the car dealerships, flailing around with no idea how to protect himself so what’s even the point.

     

    Yes.

    Curiously enough the Ngata injury was a clear example of RGIII staying inbounds for no particular reason instead of just stepping outside the field.

     

    Bad luck caught up to him and to us since we're searching for our franchise QB

    (we never really believed in Cousins)

    • Like 1
    • Thumb up 1
  15. 21 minutes ago, ToaCommander said:

     

    Exactly How I feel.

     

     Remembering in the 1st year how RG3 and our zone read offense was the talk of the NFL... then Ravens and Haloti Ngata came along and basically broke RG3 in half... and then everything fell apart...

     

    I prefer a pocket QB that can run, not a running RB that can throw.

     

    More like Shanny rode the horse too hard. 

    Those options-reads were going to fail sooner or later. And RGIII never learned how to slide, which made things much worse.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  16. 7 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

    Is it just me or are we going for the oldest aged roster in 2024 or maybe some cheep name recognition signings scheme to sell tickets. All these guys we have signed seem to have already reached their ceiling.

     

    It's a considerable culture change.

     

    You need new guys to develop new values and a new winning culture.

     

    So between the guys we just signed (and I'm the first to admit I hadn't even heard about half of them) and the upcoming draft the FO expects the fanbase to hear the message loud and clear.

     

    I reallllyyyy hope they succeed. 

     

    Now about those uniforms and team name...

×
×
  • Create New...