Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Califan007 The Constipated

Members
  • Posts

    42,835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    181

Posts posted by Califan007 The Constipated

  1. 4 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said:

     

    The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females?

     

    The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

     

    The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

     

    The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

     

    The one on the left certainly is. The one on the right has a very different profile. Plus the hair looks the same, it's streaked and she isn't streaking her hair now so it's all dark. Does Boebert being on a website trolling for sugar daddies so different than her husband showing his penis to underage females? They're both pretty raunchy people. 

     

    Ok, ok. Jeebus lol...

    • Haha 1
  2. I'm pretty surprised that I'm not really seeing much in the form of angry push back on twitter from Trump supporters...Normally it shows up on my timeline without needing to do anything. Now I'm actively looking for it and not finding a whole lot other than "There's no cross-examination, this is a sham!"...Having nothing but Trump's inner circle giving their first-hand testimony so far pretty much leaves little for diehard Republicans to **** about.

     

     

    FVK-cDbUsAAJPq3.jpg

    • Haha 5
    • Thumb up 1
    • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 4
  3. 14 minutes ago, PeterMP said:

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/12/opinions/alex-jones-inforwars-former-staffer-owens/index.html

     

    Opinion: I escaped Alex Jones’ world. This is what I learned

     

    There are people that actually believe all of the nonsense including Hillary cut off a girls face and wore it.

     

    And they want to elect more people like MTG.

     

     

    giphy.gif

  4. 4 hours ago, JCB said:

     

    Can you fill us in for those (like me) who don't have a paid subscription?

  5. 2 hours ago, Forever A Redskin said:

     

    Lol. So when people claim antifa actors were responsible for violence on January 6th it's conspiracy.... But you're allowed to make the same bogus claims for the BLM riots... Rigghhhtt.

     

     

    That's what happens when one claim has an abundance of proof to back it up, and the other claim has nothing but convoluted conspiracy theories to back it up. It genuinely appears you're incapable of telling the difference.

    • Thanks 1
    • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 2
  6. 9 minutes ago, Forever A Redskin said:

     

    People trying to silence someone usually means they are afraid of what they are saying.

     

    All he does is report on the stuff that the mainstream media won't. Its sad it enrages people to the extent that it does.

     

     

    Hmmm....nope. Nope....I'm looking, but I can't find logic anywhere in that post.

     

    It reminds me of the "logic" conspiracy theorists use...if there's no proof their conspiracy theory is right, it's chalked up as proof that their conspiracy theory MUST be right. It emboldens the conspiracy theorist because they must be onto something if people are trying sooo hard to prove it's wrong! The absense of evidence the conspiracy is real just means those in power are working overtime to try and conceal it from the public! If people are trying to silence him, it just means he's speaking the truth and it scares them!

     

    I can't process the mental gymnastics needed to live within that mindset and feel empowered by it.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
    • Thumb up 1
    • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 2
  7. 8 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

     

    Detective Comics a bunch of fn groomers, that's what going on!!!

     

    Teen Titans 😒 more like "This Ain't Teen Titans", lolz

     

    There's a gif from some cartoon that I assumed was cropped...that really makes you wonder exactly what they were showing in that episode lol...I can't find it, but I remember seeing it and thinking "What THE hell..." there as well lol...

    • Like 1
  8. 23 minutes ago, Forever A Redskin said:

     

    I believe his exact words were "PEACEFULLY March to the capitol"

     

    He spoke literally 10,826 words at that speech...and said "peacefully" once. Once, early in the speech.

     

    He spent the rest of his speech--before and after uttering "peacefully"--vomiting up lie after lie after lie, whipping up his supporters, telling them that they can not win back their country by being weak...and towards the very end of those 10,826 words he told his whipped-up supporters "we fight, we fight like hell, and if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore." He spent 4 months leading up to that speech telling lies as reasons for his supporters to be angry, to be suspicious, to be fearful, to expect the election to be stolen by Democrats, and to distrust anyone who says otherwise.

     

    But, yanno, he did say the word "peacefully" that one time, which by any reasonable measure should have negated every single thing he ever said, did, and alluded to that pointed to the exact opposite.

    • Like 4
    • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 2
  9. 4 minutes ago, PeterMP said:

     

    I will say, I'm not sure he actually and directly encouraged his supporters to storm the Capitol.  I'm not sure he knew what he actually wanted them to do.  I think he wanted to do something drastic and aggressive.  But I'm not sure he had an actual plan for them to storm the Capitol.

     

    And this is why the Jan 6 hearings need to take place and be public, even if some think "nothing will come of it".

×
×
  • Create New...