Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Califan007 The Constipated

Members
  • Posts

    42,838
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    181

Posts posted by Califan007 The Constipated

  1. 11 hours ago, Larry said:

    Do I want to know what "totally false disinformation" he's ranting about?  Afraid I might get infected if I follow the link. 


    Maddow’s tweet quoted a Rolling Stone article about rural hospitals getting backed up from people being admitted for taking too much Ivermectin…The article itself quoted a doctor who was making the claim. The doc was associated with some large established hospitals but also worked with small rural hospitals and was only talking about those smaller ones. Spokespeople for the larger hospitals he was associated with said they were not running out of beds due to Ivermectin use, and antivaxxers ran with it saying the doctor lied. Not sure anyone checked with the small rural hospitals.

    • Thanks 1
  2. On 10/10/2022 at 11:10 AM, EmirOfShmo said:

    Somehow I got on Tucker's email list a couple of months ago. Most of the time I just delete them but I take a split second to read the conspiracy du jour they use to fundraise. This is one from today from "Attorney Larry Klayman":

     

     

    I knew I had heard that attorney's name before lol...

     

    Larry Klayman, Conservative Wingnut Lawyer, Gets Reprimanded By Florida Bar, Is Broke

     

    https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/larry-klayman-conservative-wingnut-lawyer-gets-reprimanded-by-florida-bar-is-broke-6532819

     

     

    Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman suspended from legal practice in DC

     

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/judicial-watch-founder-larry-klayman-suspended-legal-practice-dc-2022-09-16/

     

     

    Nutbag Lawyer Larry Klayman Files $20 Trillion Suit Against China For Coronavirus 'Bioweapon'

     

    https://abovethelaw.com/2020/03/nutbag-lawyer-larry-klayman-files-20-trillion-suit-against-china-for-coronavirus-bioweapon/

     

     

    • Haha 3
  3. 1 hour ago, Peregrine said:

    You were literally wrong, actively disagreeing with someone who was better informed and literally right, and thats about usual.  

     

    Im not surprised normal conversation for you is like that and you dont care about knowing what you are talking about before talking, but at least show more self awareness than Snyder.

     

     

    I'll help you out lol...I'll just act as if you asked me to 😉

     

    You said I was "literally wrong"...correct? Let's investigate that further:

     

    Me: "I haven't read the tweets where she calls someone a troll yet."

     

    Was I wrong there?...Did I in fact read tweets by her where she called people "trolls" and just, what...forgot?...I mean, it's possible you misunderstood that sentence, and that you read it as "I have yet to read a tweet from her where she calls someone a troll." That's a completely different sentence with a completely different meaning, but maybe that's how you wrongfully interpreted it.

     

    Me: "Just for accuracy sake, it's more like she's being the troll than calling others "trolls"

     

    Was I wrong there?...Was she not being a troll?

     

    I mean, maybe she wasn't being one...then again, nobody said she wasn't being one, so not sure how I could have been proven wrong there.

     

    I also seemed to (wrongfully, in your eyes) believe you can be a troll without calling someone else a "troll"...Kind of like calling someone a pervert without being a pervert yourself lol...I mean, it's possible you misunderstood this one as well and--for whatever reason--believe being a troll and calling someone a troll are the exact same thing.

     

    But just to add clarity for you, here's what I did not say, in any way, ever:

     

    Me: "She has never called anyone a 'troll'..."

     

    Read that one again...never said it, or anything like it. At all. Not once.

     

    That's a good starting point. So I'll ask again: show me where I was "literally wrong" and what I was "literally wrong" about...you're welcome lol.

     

     

    EDIT: almost forgot…here is where you claim that I’m playing semantics to avoid showing me where I was “literally wrong”. 👍

     

  4. 6 minutes ago, Voice_of_Reason said:

    Well, don't let facts get in the way of a good narrative, I always say....

     

    What about when you acknowledge that it's not a fact like I did in that edit? lol...

    Screen Shot 2022-10-10 at 11.26.12 AM.jpg

     

     

    4 minutes ago, Peregrine said:

    You were literally wrong, actively disagreeing with someone who was better informed and literally right, and thats about usual.  

     

    Im not surprised normal conversation for you is like that and you dont care about knowing what you are talking about before talking, but at least show more self awareness than Snyder.

     

    You're being reactive simply because it's me instead of actually reading and understanding what I wrote.

     

    For example...show me where I was wrong. Seriously. I'll wait before responding further.

  5. 9 minutes ago, Voice_of_Reason said:

    Eh, I don't put Spurrier quitting on Snyder.  I put hiring Spurrier on Snyder after firing Marty, which I still think was the worst move he's made as an owner.  

     

     

    I was mostly joking because I originally said Snyder fired Spurrier...it was an attempt to keep the point of my post on track lol...

     

     

    3 minutes ago, Peregrine said:

    "I havent read the tweets where she calls someone a troll yet", "Just for accuracy sake, it's more like she's being the troll than calling others "trolls"

     

    Also Califan, 'Why spend the 20 seconds reading her tweets when I can disagree with people who are right?'

     

    It was just about her first tweet response in her new "Defending Dan" position.

     

    You mean people who literally say "She's calling people 'trolls' " and then post not one but two tweets of her never using the word "troll"?...Is that what you mean?

     

    Plus, why should I have to spend even 3 seconds looking for whatever the person is talking about when I can just ask them what they're talking about? That's how normal conversation goes lol...

  6. 6 minutes ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

    No, instead we got an owner who in 23 years has tanked everything he’s been a part of including our team, that when he inherited it was one of the most historic franchises and largest fanbases in all of professional sport.

     

    23 freaking years, man.  We are 23 years in and this dude has burnt this whole thing to the ground and has no means to rebuild it.

     

     

    Hence my sig lol...

  7. 5 minutes ago, FLSkinz83 said:

     

    Snyder's first 5 years were....10-6 (playoff win), 8-8, 8-8, 7-9, 5-11 (not very good...love the ole ball coach)

     

    Tepper first 5 years.....7-9, 5-11, 5-11, 5-12, 1-4

     

    Your point that I singled out and responded to was about Tepper firing two head coaches in 5 years. And in fact, Snyder firing THREE head coaches in 5 years while they were doing significantly better than the coaches Tepper fired may make those decisions worse lol...

     

     

    5 minutes ago, NoVaSkins21 said:

    I think Spurrier actually beat Snyder to the punch and resigned while on the golf course.

     

    Ah, ok...I thought he got a call either right before or right after the season from Snyder.

  8. 4 minutes ago, Cooleyfan1993 said:

    lol and then there’s Jason Wrong, who was up at 1:30 AM replying to somebody on twitter that tweeted that Kevin Sheehan reported that Jean Medina was a Snyder hire, and that Wright wasn’t involved in that

     

    wright basically said “I led the process and hired her, if Kevin had a question he could’ve called and asked me. That loss was brutal and we need to be better immediately, but no need to make stuff up tonight”

     

    uhhh, taking credit for hiring someone that’s currently arguing with fans on twitter isn’t doing what you think it’s doing my guy 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

     

    Yeah, but letting misinformation take hold as conventional wisdom "fact" on social media isn't any better. Plus I guess he was kinda calling out the media for not doing the basic step of asking lol...

  9. 16 minutes ago, FLSkinz83 said:

     

    3) We could have fired two coaches mid season in the first 5 years of ownership.  

     

    These are just a few examples.

     

    Ummm lol...

     

    giphy.gif

     

    Snyder's first 5 years:

     

    - Fired Turner mid-season

    - Fired Schottenheimer after 1 season

    - Caused Spurrier to quit after 2 seasons

     

    Not really any better, and arguably worse lol.

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  10. 10 minutes ago, DJHJR86 said:

     

     https://twitter.com/jeanmedina/status/1579302541099048960

     

    She is calling people "trolls".

     

     

     

     

    8 minutes ago, Cooleyfan1993 said:

    Pretty sure he’s referring to the tweet where she said “not new to Washington. Or trolls”, and posted a “hello” gif. Granted, it was in response to someone saying “we hate Snyder and we hate you too”. 
     

    (whoever posted the tweet in here a couple pages back edited out the tweet cause the gif sent to her was a biiiiit graphic)

     

    8 minutes ago, rockluc said:

     

    (screenshot of tweet)

     

     

    Is this the only time she called anyone a "troll"? (asking honestly)...for me personally I don't have a problem whatsoever in her response to that specific tweet...for a team mired in sexual harassment charges and claims, welcoming a new female Washington employee with a drawing of a penis up against Leo's lips was, um, ill-conceived at best. Reminded me a little of the guy on twitter who asked Julie Donaldson on Twitter right after she was hired if Snyder asked her to suck his dick (he felt he was slamming Snyder, not her)...her response was perfect and professional. But if Julie had instead called him a "troll" I wouldn't exactly have been upset by it.

  11. 2 minutes ago, DJHJR86 said:

     

     

     

    She's very adversarial to anyone who mentions Snyder.  Seriously, go look at her tweets & replies.  It's endless since she was hired.

     

     

    Uh, she didn't call anyone a "troll" there, either lol...you even put "troll" in quotes in your earlier post (...and calling them "trolls"?)...

     

    Just for accuracy sake, it's more like she's being the troll than calling others "trolls". That's not good, either, of course lol...

  12. 3 minutes ago, FLSkinz83 said:

    For all the people that want a new owner; which is everyone.....there have been 3 new owners in the past 10 years, not including Denver which just happened.

     

    Jimmy Haslam - Browns.....1 winning season out of 10

    Shad Khan - Jags...1 winning season out of 10

    David Tepper - Panthers...0 winning seasons out of 5

     

     

     

    I liked your post not in *support of Snyder, but in support of adding info to the discussions that isn't usually brought up. Need more of that...👍

     

    *and I know at least one or two of you chuckleheads would have interpreted it that way lol...

    • Like 1
  13. 5 minutes ago, DJHJR86 said:

     

    Does she need to be on Twitter battling fans and calling them "trolls"?

     

    I haven't read the tweets where she calls someone a troll yet...but in the one you posted she responded to what appears to be either a question based on lack of knowledge or a rhetorical questions to convey judgement, and her answer wasn't really a sign of anything other than correction.

  14. 1 hour ago, DJHJR86 said:

     

    They hired this woman to tweet in defense of Snyder.  Seriously, go look at her replies.  

     

     

     

    What if she's right, though?

     

     

    "According to Illinois State Police records, NFL franchise owners, team sponsors and college donors have also gotten escorts.

     

    The teams, which pay for the service, say it's about convenience, easing travel through a crowded metropolis. The state police, which assigns officers on overtime shifts, says it's about safety, protecting teams from possible "mob action" while they're in transit."

     

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/lake-forest/ct-police-escorts-sports-met-20141220-story.html

     

     

     

    "In what has become part of their travel routine, the Minnesota Vikings left the team's Eden Prairie practice facility for Sunday's game in Baltimore under a police escort, with players and equipment already screened so they wouldn't have to go through normal airport security checkpoints.

     

    Team officials say those procedures - common throughout the National Football League and paid for by the team - are necessary for security reasons."

     

    https://www.athleticbusiness.com/operations/safety-security/news/15144963/vikings-travel-routine-includes-300-police-escort

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...