Califan007 The Constipated

Rooting for the Browns to lose huge today and next week (and of course the week after that lol)...let the players and coaches just want to get the season over with by the time we play them.

5 minutes ago, Skinsinparadise said:

From a momentum standpoint I think that was the perfect game. The team has to be Uber pumped in a way that likely carries to next week.
 

But don’t like it from the stand point of wanting to avoid SF in the playoffs 

Root for a Dallas collapse 👍

1 minute ago, Destino said:

Seven game winning drives on the season now for the QB that wasn’t good enough for the commanders.  

I love hot it makes sure to say "regular season" lol...

1 minute ago, Renegade7 said:

OT almost seemed required to top this off, don't yall dare let this end in a tie...

Watch it end in a safety lol...

I stopped watching and walked away when it was 33-0...just came back to it during the spot review. Good goobly woogly lol..

8 minutes ago, Skinsinparadise said:

Bye week stuff hopefully is true as to being an asset with our late bye 

 

Every team whose bye was before Nov. 20 will be playing their 5th game in 4 weeks, though...it's not a big deal.

8 minutes ago, Skinsinparadise said:

I think yes. Because if they beat the Giants they have a beat on the 6th spot and I’d rather play Minny than SF

I'm thinking that now, too lol...lawd.

This is getting YOO-gly...

28 minutes ago, MrJL said:

 

here's something I wonder about.  The NFL sets up the schedule to try to have some drama at the end of the season.  But is it better to have mostly fresh matchups in the playoffs or is having rematches acceptable

I think there are positives to both. Rematches breed rivalries (or intensify those that already exist). Fresh matchups invigorate the league a bit more.

2 hours ago, MrJL said:

 

pretty sure there's some overlap in those schedules

No doubt.

The interesting thing is, for the most part over the last 8 games the teams on that list only lost to each other.

I guess I had to write it out to have it hit me...best records over the last 8 games:

Eagles 7-1

49ers 7-1

Bengals 7-1

Commanders 6-1-1

Chiefs 6-2

Cowboys 6-2

Vikings 6-2

Bills 6-2

That's some quality company to keep, I don't care who we've played.

10 hours ago, Warhead36 said:

Man I hope Margot Robbie and Ryan Gossling got PAID for the Barbie movie because that looks like its gonna be an abomination 

I don't think we're the demographic they were aiming for with that movie lol...

27 minutes ago, BatteredFanSyndrome said:

General line of thinking on that is folks want zero reason for him to change his mind.  Such a fickle and petty man as Snyder, who knows what could drive such a decision.  

That's more wishful thinking than realistic analysis, though. If the team goes 7-9-1 it's not gonna have anymore of an effect on Snyder selling than if it goes 10-6-1. If anything, I could see him wanting to go out on a high note (relatively speaking)...selling the team after making the playoffs with a pretty decent roster would allow him to say "I left the team in good shape" and take some credit for whatever success may come under the next owner. Selling the team after going 2-15 pretty much solidifies him as the worst owner, a label he's been trying to fight off.

1 hour ago, TD_washingtonredskins said:

That's why the safest long-term stance as a fan for a while now has been to root for failure. I know many people have their (legitimate) reasons to disagree with that (it's not the players' fault, winning is fun, etc.), but that's the quickest and safest path to a decent human being sitting atop the Washington NFL organization again. 

 

But, alas, every couple/few years the team goes on a winning streak that comes out of nowhere and isn't repeatable. In the past, those streaks have provided Snyder with just enough fan excitement and goodwill to stay afloat. I hope it either falls apart soon or doesn't change his course this time.  

Why does everyone continue to think losing = Snyder selling? Nothing about the win/loss column is going to drive that.

I won't be seeing either one of these lol...still:

We need more of this lol (one NSFW word):

2 minutes ago, mistertim said:

I'm not surprised at all that Trump is trying to get into NFTs, because they're basically complete nonsense and scams that will eventually implode like crypto. If cryptocurrency is dumb, NFTs are crypto's retarded cousin. Perfect fit for a grifter like Mango Mussolini. 

The concept of NFTs is fine. The reality that some of these NFTs have been purchased for millions of dollars is laughably stupid lol...