Chachie Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 I chose Cooley, but Portis is certainly justifiable. TDs were my criteria for judging. Oh, and GET SAMUELS OFF THAT LIST!!! :mad: He just plain SUCKS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Cooley was a great addition but 1300 yards is 1300 yards... Clinton is still the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicealot Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 If you would...any of those who voted for Gardner, PLEASE explain whay???:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krisjan76 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 How could you guys even talk about an Offensive MVP on a 6-10 team? :puke: Just kidding I'd pick Portis too. I doubt any of the backup RB's would have contributed 1,300 yards had they started all year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Rod Gardner, of course. :jk: COOOOOOOOOOOOOOLEY!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Originally posted by HeavyHitta31 I was wondering that myself...probably obsessive Eagle fans who are depressed at the loss of TO. Well, they're more than welcome to have Gardner as a replacement! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.