goldenster95 Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 . . . resemble the '99 game at the Giants' house? In that game, Davis, Brad Johnson, and Mike Westbrook had huge games en route to a 50-21 thrashing of the Giants. Any chance that the injuries to the Giants, the mutinous atmosphere amongst their ranks, and their thin personnel may actually be laying the foundation for another such game? Hmmmm . . . doubt it, but just wanted to know what others think . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinthePRF Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 In that game the Redskins were reeling from the devastating opening loss to Dallas. The Giants were coasting in off a nice opener. In this situation the roles are reversed, so I don't see us blowing the Giants out. Though it will probably happen eventually, I doubt the Giants will be ready to just throw in the towel in week 2. They'll come to play, the game will be close. Or at least, closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inmate running the asylum Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 Yeah I think its a good possibility. Kurt Warner can be rattled. Remember last year when he came to Giants stadium with the Rams and had about 6 turnovers? So you know Greg Williams is going to blitz the hell out of him and I dont think their revamped OL will be able to protect him. I predict the Redskins 34, NY Giants 13. I'm predicting the Giants turn the ball over 4 times and beat themselves. If the Giants do play well, then this mutiny crap is being overblown. But I dont think it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDane Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 50-21. Ah yes, I remember that one. What a great time. I was at that game, along with Ancal. Took one of my wife beaters - sorry, um, undershirts - and painted it like a Dexter Manley jersey. Screamed my stupid head off. I like to say that I had a critical role in the scoring of all of the 50 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankRizzo Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 To answer your question....no, I do not think the games will be alike. I don't forsee us giving up 21 points to them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Happy Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 The Giants running game is not a whole lot better than the Bucs. That puts a lot of pressure to score points with the passing game. That is pressure that Kurt Warner and that offensive line can't handle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streater101 Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 This will be a tough game for us, IMO. This is the Giants home opener, and they'll most definitely want to rebound after the poor showing against Philly. Even in a game that Philly dominated, there were quite a few missed opportunities from NY that could have capitalized on and made it a closer game. With that being said, final score: 48-6 Washington :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom [Giants fan] Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 he Giants running game is not a whole lot better than the Bucs. That puts a lot of pressure to score points with the passing game. That is pressure that Kurt Warner and that offensive line can't handle.[/Quote]Tiki Barber and a much improved Ron Dayne is not better than Charlie Garner and his 25 yards against you last week? Come on now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 I really think that if we don't get off to a quick start against them, it could be one of those typical see-saw battles in the Meadowlands that I always hated. Turnovers are going to be the key to this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.