fish Posted April 26, 2004 Share Posted April 26, 2004 I've read a 2nd and a 5th. Which one is it? The Post sez next year's 5th round pick but ESPN reported and the Times sez 2nd rnd. Fill me in. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted April 26, 2004 Share Posted April 26, 2004 It's next year's second round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince62 Posted April 26, 2004 Share Posted April 26, 2004 next year's second and we swapped this year's fifth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish Posted April 26, 2004 Author Share Posted April 26, 2004 That's what I thought. I saw "5th rnd" in the Post article this morning and got happy. Giving up a 2nd rnd pick kinda sucks! I hope this guy is worth it. Thanks for the confirmation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swissarmy47 Posted April 26, 2004 Share Posted April 26, 2004 We swaped 5th round picks this year - with us moving down about 10 spots or so and them moving up to our spot, plus next year's second round pick - the latter obviously being the more valuable piece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jschlesi Posted April 26, 2004 Share Posted April 26, 2004 A second is a lot. But, we was the most productive TE in college. He also projects to a H Back. Could be a starter this year. I wanted help on d line but this was Gibbs' pick. He is entitled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgunner Posted April 26, 2004 Share Posted April 26, 2004 A second is high. now were down a pick next year already. However with Cooley's size at 265 it conjures up images of a massive running machine with him lined up tight or as a lead blocker. Clinton should have 1600-1800 yards next season.:notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.