ruggerid Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 What about these 2? Both are solid starters from the past, relatively cheap, and could fill some voids on our team. Wash. Post Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty P For The Pulitzer Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Originally posted by ruggerid What about these 2? Both are solid starters from the past, relatively cheap, and could fill some voids on our team. Wash. Post Article No thanks. Bruener is supposedly retiring, and we don't need anyone from that secondary they had, they were terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragintd Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Bruener would be a nice, cheap pickup. He's not much of a pass catcher, but he's still a pretty decent blocking TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drex Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Washington was a starter on a Pittsburgh secondary that was atrocious. If he isn't good enough on that secondary, I doubt he would be good enough here. Bruener on the other hand, could be tempting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SB33 Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 No No No No No These guys are names but the talent is gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 I just realized how much Sammy Baugh looked like Steve Martin, or maybe Joe Walsh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryClark Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Looks like Steve Martin to me. No, we don't want either of these guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.