Ernie5 Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 What is sad is our second round picks these last couple of years have not been a factor at all Yr right, of course, but they were both hurt. How is that poor drafting? Although I wouldn't have necessarily taken Jacobs, how can anyone make an honest assessment of the guy given his freak injury in the pre-season? As for Betts, he showed he could wind up a really good choice if he can stay healthy (although I've heard some flake issues recently). Three years, we took Smoot in the second, which worked out quite well, thank you. I thought our third rounder last year turned out well -- Dockery started a lot and showed great improvement. Imagine him learning from Boss Hog? I have no issue with that pick in the slightest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awesome Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 God it keeps getting uglier doesn't it. The more that comes out, the more an ass Spurrier appeared to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codeorama Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 What a load of crap... The Panthers: "Were so smart, we knew all along..." Just another reason I hope they lose Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyGator Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Stories like this make me wish there was no off week before the SB. These reporters must be really bored. The media has never liked Spurrier.:puke: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn X Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Originally posted by codeorama What a load of crap... The Panthers: "Were so smart, we knew all along..." Just another reason I hope they lose Sunday. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish Posted January 31, 2004 Share Posted January 31, 2004 Originally posted by bulldog would you really call Rock and Darnerian 'impact' players at this stage Bufford? to me an impact player is a back that goes for 1,100 yards or a receiver that catches 60 balls. It all comes down to semantics; what is the definition of "impact" that you're using? I would call both of them impact players. So I guess I should define my terms. By impact I mean: What it is - an impact player fullfills an important role on the team. That role has an "impact" on the outcome of a team's season. Both Rock and D-mac did that; Rock as the starting RB for the last few games and D-Mac in being the somewhat "go to" guy in the red zone or maybe just the end zone. What it is NOT: Hall of Famer, perennial Pro-Bowler, league leader in a statistical catagory. By those definitions, I think we can call Rock and D-Mac "impact" players for the Skins for this season, well at least I can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.