Execution56 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Let's hope Campbell doesn't get the slightest nick on a scramble or a sack because Brunell will be back in.... Let's not jinx the young QB... PLEASE! :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
909997 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 brunell is the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedBNG Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 This first responce is though . i busted out laughing :laugh: :laugh: Same here. Like "What you talking about Willis?" The 3rd one too... Demand a full scale investigation to find out what it is that Brunell has on Gibbs to win his undying loyalty? _________________________________________________________________ One of the radio guys was saying that Gibbs didn't guarantee Campbell all seven remaining games... Radio guys :doh: We know Gibbs won't pull JC if we lose to Tampa. So if we lose to the Panthers also... we're 3-8. Playoffs?... OFFICIALLY NADA! So then, what is the purpose or goal of putting in MB? To be our starter next year and go thru this all over again? MB will get us to 8-8? I truly doubt that. Maybe 6-10? We've already done that ('04). Not comparing (so give me some slack), but Joe Montana... 1979... 49ers... 2-14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor4Life Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I would call him coach Joe Kerry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruinSkin Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would you do? Hopefully this remains a joke...I mean he cant change his mind...Can he? What I can't believe is that you're 28 years old and said "LOL". Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'KanSkinFan Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I would wonder what dirt Brunell has on Gibbs.....lol God and prayer - that is what true christians have "on each other" - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcofdc Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 What I can't believe is that you're 28 years old and said "LOL". Wow. Im sorry I didnt check with you o mighty age monitor. Please forgive for not checking with you. I didnt know I was to old to say LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1SkinsFan Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 What would you do? Hopefully this remains a joke...I mean he cant change his mind...Can he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimrobyn Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 as frightening as this proposition sounds, did anyone else get irked when they read this:"We don't know what'll happen there," Gibbs said of Brunell's future. "If he sits back there in that second spot and gets a breath of fresh air and gets rested, I don't know what'll happen in the future." sounds eerily familiar to what happened when brunell was pulled for ramsey a couple years ago You know what, when I read that same thing I thought OH HELL here we go again! Gibbs is making some damn excuses to put Brunell back in (eventually). For some strange reason, his mind is ONLY on Brunell. He thinks that's the QB of the future. Gibbs needs some serious HELP!!! MI only hope that I'm misreading this BUT my gut tells me something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskin81 Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I think that if Campbell does well down the stretch, playoffs or not, he will be the starter for next season. Brunell will probably stay on at least one more season. Brunell is getting old, yes, and it shows, but at least we'd have a reliable veteran QB to step in should anything happen to JC. Collins will be traded in the offseason.Just my :2cents: Pretty much sums it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.