stevenaa Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I keep hearing points that the owners gave in on, but nothing on what the players gave in on. Seems to have been rather one sided. I've heard talk that when the last CBA was agreed too, they purposely crafted it so that not extending it would be much more painful then working it out. The pain was supposed to be shared, but it doesn't seem so. Does anyone know if the Union compromised on anything, other than going from 60% to 59.5%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.