Horse-and-Plow Farming Making a Comeback

[Baculus]

At least for me, I found this to be an interesting article. It goes to show that some forms of technology, no matter how low-tech, never outlive their usefulness.

Horse-and-Plow Farming Making a Comeback

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050722/ap_on_bi_ge/farm_scene

By JOSEPH B. FRAZIER, Associated Press Writer Fri Jul 22, 3:23 AM ET

SISTERS, Ore. - To some, the thought of a farmer patiently working the field behind a horse and plow might evoke pangs of nostalgia for the early days of agriculture. But in fact, the practice is making a comeback.

Ol' Dobbin hasn't run the tractors out of the fields yet. But increasingly, small farmers are finding horse-powered agriculture a workable alternative to mechanization.

Lynn Miller, whose quarterly "Small Farmer's Journal" tracks horse-farming, estimates about 400,000 people depend in some measure on animal power for farming, logging and other livelihoods. He says the number is on the rise.

Many are Amish farmers in Iowa and Pennsylvania who shun mechanization, but some are farmers who have turned to horses because of the bottom line, citing soaring fuel prices and the ability of the animals to produce their own replacements.

They also say the animals are better for the soil and can be used in wet weather when a tractor often cannot.

Miller, who farms with horses on his own ranch, said the practice began spreading beyond Amish communities about 20 years ago.

"When I started 31 years ago there were no companies making equipment for animal-powered agriculture," he said in his office in this central Oregon town. "Fifteen years ago I could count them. Today I have no idea how many there are."

Miller estimated that 60 percent to 70 percent of those who try horse-and-plow farming stay with it. "It takes a certain personality," he said. "It's a craft, not a science."

Miller said a farmer with horses can earn triple or more the earnings per acre than one farmed by agribusiness.

Ron VanGrunsven farms about 50 acres with horses near Council, Idaho, and has used horses for years there and in Oregon's Willamette Valley.

"They're more economical," he said. "They raise their own replacements, you can train them yourself and raise their feed."

A mare can produce a foal every year or so, and Miller says that, if properly trained, one can bring about $2,000 after two years.

A plow horse usually lasts 16 or 18 years, Miller said. He said he looks after his stable of nine carefully and veterinarian bills rarely total $200 a year.

VanGrunsven said a two-horse team and a farmer can plow about an acre and a half a day if the ground is right and that an acre usually produces more than enough hay to feed a horse for a year.

"Most of my equipment is not new," said VanGrunsven. "It is from the 1930s or earlier. It has been repaired and cleaned up. ... The older things were designed so they could be fixed if they broke. When newer things break, they have to be replaced."

Horse farming was common until the end of World War II, when the government and manufacturers started promoting mechanization to soak up the surplus industrial capacity, Miller said.

Horses could often be used as down payments for tractors, he said, "and they went to the glue factories by the hundreds of thousands."

[flyingtiger1013]

Al Gore must be so happy!

I'm really surprised that guy's vet bill is only around $200 a year for 9 horses, though. I think the vet is sleeping with his wife/daughter....

[Baculus]

Hey, if it works, it works, right? I don't think this would be that practical for huge farms, but for smaller ones it's probably workable.

I suppose, if the farmer doesn't have a reason to take their horses to the vet, and they take good care of their animals, perhaps the bill would be low. I really don't know enough about horses to judge how expensive are their bills.

[Soliloquy]

Originally posted by flyingtiger1013

I'm really surprised that guy's vet bill is only around $200 a year for 9 horses, though.

Yeah, I find that difficult to believe.

Even $200/horse would be cheap.

Interesting story, though.

[BlueTalon]

Reading the story, I couldn't help but think of the old Soviet collective farms, and how much more productive were the individual little plots that people ran for themselves.

I'm not saying today's mechanized farming is as inefficient as the Soviet farms -- far from it! We could literally feed the word, I believe, if we didn't have to pay farmers not to grow stuff.

But I think even with that, the small farms can still be more productive.

[jpillian]

Originally posted by Baculus

VanGrunsven said a two-horse team and a farmer can plow about an acre and a half a day if the ground is right and that an acre usually produces more than enough hay to feed a horse for a year.

Wow. That'd be a lot of days of plowing to keep an average farm going

[twa]

Originally posted by jpillian

Wow. That'd be a lot of days of plowing to keep an average farm going

Yeah ....but it comes with a great view.:laugh:

It is great that some find it economical to use livestock to work with,however it is not practical in large farms.

Most small farms are willing to sacrifice time and effort rather than money for equipment.