madden lot

But it's a rumor. 

If its Glenn i hope he hire Santana Moss to coach the wr's 

I finally watched CW highlights and i tell y'all the guy is special. He reminds me of a 30 yr. Later Brett farve. We gotta trade up and get this guy. What he does in the pocket i have never seen before from the qb position. I've never seen him play or his highlights but now that i did. Man we gotta get this guy.

"that that that" was also something he did countless times as he would answer questions. 

2 minutes ago, MrJL said:

 

hopefuly the new regime is smarter than Dan

Thay are.

Sam can be a good backup qb in this league. Hopefully the new staff get a qb. I'll take brissett if it means no sam. The guy really irritated me this. He started to remind me of y'all boy jonny beck. 

If we win I'm going be rooting hard for us to win out

I'm loving this

I said it in the misery game thread Thursday and I'll say it again, EB is ego driven stubborn ass maniac. Why run a play to end the half when we, him and everyone on the sidelines know we not trying to score. He has done this multiple times this season. Why why why??

1 minute ago, Rufus T Firefly said:

The TO, going deep and then running into a loss. 

 

All beyond horrible.

 

People who think EB should be a candidate for the Head Coach job, go sit in the corner and think about how wrong you are.

EB is a ego driven stubborn ass maniac 

Lls @ all y'all complaining when y'all would say we suck all week then game time we suck and y'all are mad lmao

This game has 38+ kinda vibe

I predict we will be losing at halftime. It's a Ron thing. 

Commanders - 38

Bills - 23

@petey hodge it was 21 yrds.

@kleese You already know how i feel about these threads. Keep them coming!

I would love to kno how that poster felt after scott turner first two games.

I like this. Keep these coming. 

It's sad when we let our emotions get the best of us because a player doesn't meet our expectations. 

16 minutes ago, DiscoBob said:

Does anyone have Curtis Samuels cell phone number, I'd like to call him to get a groin update

777-9311

In my opinion, i believe the energy that has become us is going to last thru this bright new season. I'm saying it now we going have a strong stellar season. 

You can hold me to my words.

16 hours ago, Spaceman Spiff said:

I’m completely fine with Chase Young (not) working himself out of the league. 

Wait🙃

Commanders vs the hated cowboys turkey day

2 hours ago, Voice_of_Reason said:

This is my annual post which gets ignored every year, but here goes again.  (As a side note, I really should save this so I don't have to write it every year, but I don't have that type of forethought, planning, or intelligence, apparently, so here goes.)

 

1. Draft grades mean absolutely nothing.  

2. Draft grades mean absolutely nothing.

3. Draft grades mean absolutely nothing.

 

The 2012 Seahawks draft which netted them Russell Wilson and several other starters was graded an F.  

 

There is absolutely no way to know if a draft class is going to be good, bad or average until 2-3 seasons down the road.  You can start to get an inkling after 1 year, but it's really not until after the second year you really have a feeling for how the players are developing.  

 

The pundits grade drafts based on one thing, and one thing alone: how the team did against their draft board.  I don't care if it's Mel (who I love), PFF, Thor, or any other draftnik site, none of them grade players the way any of the 32 teams do, and each of the 32 teams do it somewhat differently.  They will use words like "reach" and "value."  A reach is simply a pick which based on THEIR board the player should have gone later.  Value is a player who they predicted earlier who fell.  But to have a "reach" or a "value" pick, you have to compare it against something.  And in this case, they are comparing it to their own analysis.  

 

They will also say things like "you could have gotten this player later."  Well, unless they have a DeLorean Time Machine, there is no way to substantiate that claim.  If one team took a player earlier than the punditry thought they should go, what makes you think another team or two wouldn't have had a similar grade or taken them early? 

 

The other fatal flaw in the punditries rankings is they only see a partial picture of the players: they see film, combine numbers, and some of the workouts, including senior bowl practices.  They do not see medicals or participate in interviews and conversations.  They also don't rank based on scheme fit, because how could they? So their ranking is inherently flawed.  And it's the basis of the grading.  

 

Some GM said it would be easy to get A grades in the draft: just look up the mock drafts and big boards, and follow them.  If you follow the punditry, you get a good grade.

 

Anyway, this is my annual reminder not to listen to, believe or put any stock in any draft grade given out by anybody, whether it's good or bad.  Graders will love the pick if it aligns with their thinking. 

It's done on this board every year. We be mad when our players don't get selected by our team. 

I want kool-Aid only because i love kool-Aid.