Duke Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 If so, how about our #25 for their 2 second rounders (#38 and #47)?? I'd probably take it depending on who we take with our ninth. They migh be looking for a stud DE or CB to replace Buchanon, instead of getting only 2 starters from their 2 seconds. Just another possible scenario. What do you think? :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 thread about this is already been posted. I dont know if they are or arent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Posted April 20, 2005 Author Share Posted April 20, 2005 Originally posted by Oldskool thread about this is already been posted. I dont know if they are or arent. Oh my bad then...:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie5 Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I would think the Raiders need as many picks as they can keep b/c they have lots of holes -- lots more than we do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 Originally posted by Duke Oh my bad then...:doh: :laugh: no worries. its hard to keep whats what straight right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.