WeownU Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 The Cowboys went 9-7 last year (worse than us). They have not improved nearly as much as we have (worse than us again). They lost Shawn Peyton, which is very bad for them. We gained Al Saunders, which is very good for us. Clint We were one game worse than you yes. Actually, we were a feild goal worse than you. Actually we were 3 missed field goals away from being 12-4. How can you say you did better than us this offseason? You got ARE, Archuleta, Lloyd, Carter and McIntosh. ARE......a number 3 reciever Lloyd....Inconsistant, but does have the skills when he keeps his head in the game. Archuleta. a solid player, but not a gamechanger, by any stretch. Carter....Had one good year 2 or 3 years ago. Since then hasn't done anything, I don't care what position he was playing. McIntosh...could be good if he can stay healthy, but hasn't shown that he can yet. Saunders......yeah he's good, but no way a O-coordinator comes in and changes that offense in one year. No way. It will take 2-3 easy. Dallas TO. Best reciever in the game. I don't care about his off the field stuff, and neither do oddsmakers. Vandy.....Most accurate kicker of all time Fabini.....not great, but a huge upgrade from what we had Carpenter....outstanding college linebacker in a big time school Fassano.....going to a two tight end set, will be a threat opposite Witten Watkins....a true free safety at a big time program. Runs a 4.3 and is 6'3. Can and will play center field at the FS position. How can you say we didn't do better than you in Free Agency??? Anybody can see that. Clearly the oddsmakers did. They are unbiased, cause they only care about one thing......dollors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdrun Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Dallas Carpenter....outstanding college linebacker in a big time school Just wanted to point out that what you said about Carpenter could easily be said about Rocky, there is bias all over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4481 Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 I've seen NFC ranking threads on this forum where people have the Eagles like 11 or 12.... yea but the Eagles suck!:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4481 Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 We were one game worse than you yes. Actually, we were a feild goal worse than you. Actually we were 3 missed field goals away from being 12-4.How can you say you did better than us this offseason? You got ARE, Archuleta, Lloyd, Carter and McIntosh. ARE......a number 3 reciever Lloyd....Inconsistant, but does have the skills when he keeps his head in the game. Archuleta. a solid player, but not a gamechanger, by any stretch. Carter....Had one good year 2 or 3 years ago. Since then hasn't done anything, I don't care what position he was playing. McIntosh...could be good if he can stay healthy, but hasn't shown that he can yet. Saunders......yeah he's good, but no way a O-coordinator comes in and changes that offense in one year. No way. It will take 2-3 easy. Dallas TO. Best reciever in the game. I don't care about his off the field stuff, and neither do oddsmakers. Vandy.....Most accurate kicker of all time Fabini.....not great, but a huge upgrade from what we had Carpenter....outstanding college linebacker in a big time school Fassano.....going to a two tight end set, will be a threat opposite Witten Watkins....a true free safety at a big time program. Runs a 4.3 and is 6'3. Can and will play center field at the FS position. How can you say we didn't do better than you in Free Agency??? Anybody can see that. Clearly the oddsmakers did. They are unbiased, cause they only care about one thing......dollors. TO. One of the best receivers in the game. He is not the best. I wouldn't rank him ahead of Randy Moss, Chad Johnson and Marvin Harrision. Vandy - Cant perform in the clutch. Fabini - Sucks ass. There is a reason the Jets released him. Carpenter - Ohio State defense had ridiculous talent. You guys would have been better off with Lawson. FASANO - Spent a 2nd round pick on a TE when you have a star in Witten. good job, "the Bill!":laugh: Watkins - I really love how all you retard Cowboy fans think a guy in the 5th round is going to be so great. Bottom line: We DID have a better offseason than you guys. We had only 2 weaknesses last year: WR and pass rushing DE. We have addressed both those needs and have upgraded/added depth to much more positions. You guys let a future HOFer who still is probably the strongest man in the league go and replaced him with a journeyman lineman(see sig). You also let La'Roi Glover go. Dont forget your subtractions. And Archuleta is a damn good safety. There is a reason that Lovie Smith and Gregg Williams, two of the top Defensive minds in the league wanted him so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 There e-gal fans, what can ya expect. Zona will be a much better team this year but no way there hanging with the Skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 TO is not the best reciever in the game anymore, untill he beats out Steve Smith and Santana Moss. We have the safety's to stop TO, but Dallas still doesnt have one to stop Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailSkinz1 Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 We were one game worse than you yes. Actually, we were a feild goal worse than you. Actually we were 3 missed field goals away from being 12-4. LOL! Spoken like a true Cowboy Fan! You represent your breed well! And we were 4 tackles, 6 deflected passes, 2 holding penalties, and a partridge in a pear tree away from being undefeated. :laugh: It's no wonder why no ever talks about what knowledgeable fans the Cowboys have. Geesh. Hail, H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 And they will never reach their potential without an offensive line. weren't they #1 last year in Offense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted May 15, 2006 Share Posted May 15, 2006 weren't they #1 last year in Offense? No. They were #1 in passing Offense, but dead last in Running, which is why they suck. No Offensive line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langford78 Posted May 15, 2006 Share Posted May 15, 2006 The retards who have us at longer odds than Dallas will be the same "experts" who will be surprised when we spank their sorry butts this year! :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.