Combatant Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Why do I care if Dan Snyder and Paul Allen wake up with $20 million less dollars tomorrow than they have today? I'm not seeing any of it. It's not like the team will be worse if Dan has 1 percent less money.Get the deal done. I thought Snyder was all about getting the deal done and compromising? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailYeah Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Yes but look at how much Synder has increased the value of the franshice since he bought it (despite losing all the time). Synder has done a ton to increase the marketing, profitability and bottom line of the franchise. Don't quote me on but I believe I read somewhere that in endorsements alone, Synder has increased that amount from 6-8 mil when he got the team to 48-50 mil. Don't discount the savvy business decisions and risks that Synder has taken to get the team as valuable as they are today. He's done very well at that (thankfully, he's coming around on the football part to. He was already a great businessman, now he's learning to run a football team). Do you think Dan would have the same success in Arizona? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Ugh, as Art said, this will be the media's tool to carve Snyder as the scapegoat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.