Number 44
-
Posts
829 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Articles
Downloads
Posts posted by Number 44
-
-
3 hours ago, mudhog said:
This would be a great draft. My only differences would be the first two. I'd be happy with Maye, but my slight preference would be Daniels. I like McConkey, but I think the team really needs an X receiver, so my slight preference there would be Mitchell, Legette, or Franklin.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Riggo-toni said:
I am hoping we can draft Tagovailoa on the 3rd day of the draft.
UDFA
- 2
-
3 minutes ago, JamesMadisonSkins said:
we do trade off #2 my bet would be on #3 with NE. If they really like Daniels, and we know that, and we prefer Maye or McCarthy, it would make sense to move back and add picks and take our guy at #3.
I don't see any chance of this. First, NE and WASH certainly won't honestly share with each other what player they really want to take. Even if for some strange reason they were to do that, WASH wouldn't trade back if NE wants the same player they do and NE wouldn't trade up if they want a different player than they do. There just isn't a realistic case for both teams agreeing to such a trade.
- 2
-
6 minutes ago, CommanderInTheRye said:
These oddly amusing back and forth arguments, with absolutely no possibility of agreement between parties, reminds me that most children eventually conclude that playing tic tac toe is a senseless, impossible to win endeavor.
- 3
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, Est.1974 said:
#2 and #100 could get you #3 and #34 in return.
However, yes, under no circumstances do you trade back if you want the same guy as NE for example. You just make the pick.
I don't get your logic here. It is very doubtful that NE and WAS will honestly let each other know who they want, and if for some weird reason they actually did, NE would have no reason to trade if the two teams wanted two different guys. The only conceivable reason for WAS to do this would be if they rated the two players exactly equally, which, of course, they won't.
- 5
-
I think we might want to change our thinking as far as BPA vs. positional need goes. RR isn't running our draft room any more. I don't think our brain trust will be focusing on a certain position in each round. There will be times, of course, that BPA on our board matches up well with apparent positional needs, but I really don't think GMAP has a preset notion of what position will be taken at #40, for example, IMO.
-
5 hours ago, DogofWar1 said:
That's a big jump for Rosengarten. I like him too, but he was getting projected in the mid to late rounds just a short bit ago. To go 31, whooof, that's a beeeeeeg jump. I don't know if I'd endorse that. Then again I think Kiper had Latham going #5 in one of his mocks over Alt, so he gets weird ideas sometimes.
- 1
-
3 hours ago, Voice_of_Reason said:
Oh. Thats a low-blow analogy. Even for Lovero. That one hurts.
I still can’t watch Bambi.
(goes to cry softly in a corner for the rest of the morning)
- 9
-
2: R1 P2 QB Jayden Daniels - LSU36: R2 P4 TE Ja'Tavion Sanders - Texas40: R2 P8 OT Kingsley Suamataia - BYU67: R3 P3 WR Xavier Legette - South Carolina78: R3 P14 OT Kiran Amegadjie - Yale100: R3 P36 S Calen Bullock - USC139: R5 P4 CB Elijah Jones - Boston College152: R5 P17 EDGE Jalyx Hunt - Houston Christian222: R7 P2 G Zak Zinter - Michigan
- 3
- 1
-
-
2Caleb WilliamsQB | USCA+
-
40Xavier LegetteWR | South CarolinaC+
-
46Kingsley SuamataiaOT | BYUA+
-
67Ja'Tavion SandersTE | TexasA+
-
78Kiran AmegadjieOT | YaleB+
-
82Javon BullardS | GeorgiaB
-
100Khyree JacksonCB | OregonA
-
139Elijah JonesCB | Boston CollegeB
-
152Tommy EichenbergLB | Ohio StateA+
-
222Delmar GlazeIOL | MarylandA+
-
-
27 minutes ago, Voice_of_Reason said:
I came rather close on the quote having not seen the movie probably since 2000.
You sure did. Well done.
- 1
-
31 minutes ago, Voice_of_Reason said:
Theres a quote from the 1995 movie “The American President” where one of Sydney Wade’s (Presidents girlfriend) friend tells her something like, “He’s attractive, the leader of the free world and an above average dancer. Maybe we’re setting our standards a bit high?”
That quote has been rattling around in my head every time somebody says “Maybe they don’t like Williams/Maye/Daniels”
** I couldn’t find the exact quote because when you search for “the American president anything” you get mired in a whole lot of political crap about actual presidents. So that’s a guess on the quote based on my memory from seeing the movie 25 years ago. Apologies if it’s not word for word.
- Sydney Ellen Wade: [in Beth's apartment] Why did I have to kiss him?
- Beth Wade: You kissed him? You didn't tell me that. Where did you kiss him?
- Sydney Ellen Wade: On the mouth.
- Beth Wade: Where in the White House?
- Sydney Ellen Wade: The dish room.
- Beth Wade: The dish room?
- Sydney Ellen Wade: The... China Room.
- Beth Wade: And then what happened?
- Sydney Ellen Wade: He had to go and attack Libya.
- Beth Wade: It's always something.
- Sydney Ellen Wade: Yeah... I gotta nip this in the bud. This has catastrophe written all over it.
- Beth Wade: In what language? Sydney, the man is the leader of the free world. He's brilliant, funny, handsome. He's an above-average dancer. Isn't it possible our standards are just a tad high?
- 1
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Est.1974 said:
I’m going to add WR to that. We need another quality receiver.
And, specifically, an X, IMO. Seems like we've had no height at WR in a long time.
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, DCtoCali said:
Whoaaa
Didn't see that coming!
-
6 minutes ago, clskinsfan said:
This certainly doesn't make it look like a good idea.
- 1
- 2
-
There is no way I'd trade pick #78 for picks #102 and #241. No way. That chart is absurd, IMO.
- 4
-
11 minutes ago, Voice_of_Reason said:
I don't get the people who think this move means we're trading up. I don't see how the two are connected at all.
At the VERY VERY least, a trade up from #2 to #1 is going to take a 2024 2nd and 3rd and a 2025 first. There is no question the 2025 first is a bare minimum. And the reason why is somebody who doesn't have the #2 pick would offer it to move from 3+ to get to #1.
This trade doesn't change any of that. The Bears are not going to move back because we trade them a 2 and two 3's.
Yeah, I agree moving up from a 4 to a 3 doesn't signal a trade up from #2 to #1 in any way. Heck, I don't see the logic in trading up to #1 in any case. If the Bears like Williams at #1, they aren't trading him to us, period. If they like Maye or Daniels at #1, they would never trade down to any team but us and risk losing out, so we would have no reason to move up, since Williams would fall to us if they took Maye or Daniels. The only reason they would ever trade down beyond us is if they've decided to not go with a QB. Seems unlikely, but even in that case, they would be far more likely to talk trade with NE or ARIZ or maybe LAC than us, as they'd likely get more back in trade from one of those teams. Just don't see any case where a trade would make sense for both CHI and WAS. Decide on the 2 QBs that top your draft board and take the top one that fall to you.
-
-
5 minutes ago, Voice_of_Reason said:
I like Keim too.
But honestly, I think you're either his wife or his agent.
He's certainly not Keim's wife... he says Keim is right!
- 4
-
32 minutes ago, AlwaysBeRedskins2Me said:
I love me some ketchup. I even put it on eggs. Even though some people say that that is gross. I make scrambled egg sandwiches with toast. And put ketchup and pepper on it. Yummmm.
- 1
- 1
- 3
-
4 minutes ago, CommDownMan said:
And without needing delusions or substances to feel that good!!
-
-
6 minutes ago, zCommander said:
I really really hate you. Here is a quarter, now go away!
- 1
-
-
2Caleb WilliamsQB | USCA+
-
36Chris BraswellEDGE | AlabamaA
-
57Patrick PaulOT | HoustonA+
-
67Payton WilsonLB | NC StateA
-
89Sedrick Van PranIOL | GeorgiaA+
-
101Cade StoverTE | Ohio StateA
-
103Christian MahoganyIOL | Boston CollegeC+
-
126Johnny WilsonWR | Florida StateA+
-
138Jaylen WrightRB | TennesseeA+
-
181Tykee SmithS | GeorgiaA+
-
220Kamal HaddenCB | TennesseeA
- 2
-
The Official QB Thread- JD5 taken #2. Randall 2.0 or Bayou Bob? Mariotta and Hartman forever. Fromm cut
in The Stadium
Posted
I read that that stat doesn't include scrambles. If that is true, it is a useless stat. If the QB scrambles away from pressure and makes a positive play, it doesn't count? LOL. Who comes up with stats like this?