JoeSkins Posted April 18, 2004 Share Posted April 18, 2004 The way I figure it, I don't want to give up a Pro-Bowl OT and another player to replace that OT. That's essentially what trading Samules and 5 for Gallery is, aside from the cap justification. So, why don't the Raiders call Cleveland for this? The Browns give up their first rounder, Tim Couch, Dennis Northcutt, and a future conditional pick for the number 2 pick? The Raiders need a good young QB to replace Gannon and a 2nd WR opposite Porter for when Rice and Brown are gone. If the cap numbers match up, I really can't think of a better opportunity for either team. The Raiders can pick up Steven Jackson or Udeze/Smith and fill a hole on their team. The Browns could get their precious Gallery in that case as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrossmansGators Posted April 19, 2004 Share Posted April 19, 2004 The Raiders wont be trading with anyone this year Al Davis just wont have it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah Posted April 19, 2004 Share Posted April 19, 2004 That right now to me seems to be a solid move for both of the teams. I would check the cap sit for both teams but I like that trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c4man5282 Posted April 19, 2004 Share Posted April 19, 2004 That does sound like a good trade I like it also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.