Tom [Giants fan] Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Redskins | Could Package Deal to Move Up to No. 2 Pick - from www.KFFL.com Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:06:32 -0700 Jason La Canfora, of the Washington Post, reports the Washington Redskins could offer their two first-round draft choices (No. 9 and No. 25 overall) along with WR Rod Gardner to the Miami Dolphins for the No. 2 overall draft choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonMagicJuan Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 this is old i think...well someone already posted this but yeah, i think its BULL**** because it says REDSKINS COULD....all smoke being thrown... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wwninja420 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 All these rumors. I dont like this one at all, so I guess I'll just say what happens, happens. I trust Gibbs completely so I cant hate on him now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoSkins Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 49ers | Unlikely to Trade Down, Plan to Select No. 1 Pick - from www.KFFL.com Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:11:08 -0700 Matt Maiocco, of the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, reports San Francisco 49ers head coach Mike Nolan said he knows which player he plans to select with the No. 1 overall pick in the NFL draft and while the team has entertained offers to trade down, there is a good chance they will not work out a deal to move out of the top overall slot. As reported, the candidates for the 49ers to select are believed to be QBs Aaron Rodgers (California) and Alex Smith (Utah) along with WR Braylon Edwards (Michigan). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinstzar Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 They better throw in Jason Taylor. That would make 5 players for one and I don't think we would do that without some veteran in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 That sounds stupid. The 9/25 should be enough to move up(maybe throw in a late pick to make the value match.) Gardner too? Now, if it were Gardner and the 9, sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightenupSandyBaby Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Originally posted by DonMagicJuan this is old i think...well someone already posted this but yeah, i think its BULL**** because it says REDSKINS COULD....all smoke being thrown... as much as I would like to believe this bull.... i wouldn't put it pass Snyder to make that kind of a bone head move! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 And here I thought we'd pick up some lunch pail O-linemen. I smell a danny in any trade of this nature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEANTAYLORISDAMAN Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 i love that idea skinstzar, a guy like jason taylor would be perfect, but, i hate the idea of this trade, maaan would this suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Because Nolan is playing it close to the vest, no trade with the Fins would materialize until the Niners make their pick so while all of these possibilities are floating about, nothing will happen until then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 not gonna happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TODD Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 I think it very well could happen. I don't see us standing pat with that #25 pick w/ our 9, especially now with Pac-Man a shoe-in for #6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Here is what just popped up about 4 mins ago on Google. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10473-2005Apr22.html Redskins Poised to Trade Up in Today's Uncertain Draft By Jason La Canfora Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, April 23, 2005; Page D01 The Washington Redskins remained well positioned to move into the top of today's NFL draft as team officials remained huddled at Redskins Park last night assessing their options. The Redskins hold the ninth and 25th picks in the first round and, according to numerous league sources, have made it clear to clubs with picks at the top that they are willing to talk trade. The Redskins have identified Michigan receiver Braylon Edwards as the best player available, sources said, and scheduled a final conference-call interview between him and team officials yesterday. When asked about the conversation with Edwards, Coach Joe Gibbs responded, "We're talking to a lot of people right now." Gibbs said last night that the Redskins would continue to look at various scenarios through late in the evening and he expected to be back at Redskins Park very early. The draft begins at noon. Like other teams interested in moving up, the Redskins' ability to consummate a trade for a pick in the top three or four remained clouded by the uncertainty that has defined the days leading up to the draft. Most experts agree there is no clear No. 1 player, leading many teams, including San Francisco, which holds that first pick, to consider several scenarios. The Redskins have approached every team in the league about either trading up or down, team officials have said, but with the 49ers still signaling that they might take Edwards or trade down rather than take a quarterback with the first selection as of last night, other deals remained in limbo. Miami is eager to deal the second pick, several league sources said, and as of last night trades with Washington, Cleveland (third overall pick) and Tampa Bay (fifth overall) were all possible. Multiple sources who have spoken with teams picking in the top 10 believe that the Dolphins remain the Redskins' most likely trade partner, with Miami seeking to add numerous picks under new Coach Nick Saban. However, the Redskins likely would not put a firm offer on the table until they could be assured that Edwards would be there, league sources said, and although sources close to quarterback Alex Smith believe he will be taken by San Francisco with the top pick, until that determination is final, any such deal would be on hold. The Redskins have not expressed interest in Smith, according to sources with knowledge of the situation, and appear to be focusing their efforts to trade up on Edwards. Washington's willingness to deal receiver Rod Gardner, a former No. 1 pick, could also help complete a deal. The 49ers could take their allotted 15 minutes to select today, attempting to get last-minute offers, which could provoke a team to make a better offer to land a player they feel could not be selected otherwise. Barring the 49ers taking Edwards, or trading the pick to a team that drafts him, several league sources believed the Redskins could put together a strong package to get the second-overall pick. If Washington were to deal those two picks to move up, it would be parting with five total draft picks -- including three first-rounders -- over two trades in order to land the player. The Redskins have not drafted a star receiver since taking Art Monk in the first round in 1980. The Redskins' ability to trade up crystallized Monday night, when Washington sent its first- and fourth-round picks in 2006 and its third-round pick in 2005 to Denver to acquire the 25th overall pick. Several league sources suggested that the Redskins were gearing up for a run at Edwards, who has a combination of speed and size but was not rated the top receiver by some teams because of a propensity to drop passes. Team officials said the trade was made to give the team flexibility to trade up, move down or use number-one picks in a draft that is deep at cornerback and receiver, the positions to which the Redskins devoted a bulk of their pre-draft player interviews. If the team does not trade up for a wide receiver, it could still select one today. Mike Williams, formerly of USC; Troy Williamson, South Carolina; Mark Clayton, Oklahoma; and Roddy White, Alabama-Birmingham; are projected first-round receivers in whom the team has shown interest. Washington also is seeking reinforcement of its defensive line and a source suggested last night that Shawne Merriman of Maryland and David Pollack of Georgia both have impressed team management. Furthermore, Washington showed interest in Auburn quarterback Jason Campbell, with Gibbs visiting him Tuesday; should the Redskins keep both top picks, he could be an option with the 25th choice. The Redskins have thoroughly scouted the top three cornerbacks available -- Carlos Rogers, Antrel Rolle and Adam Jones -- and one of those players has a strong chance of being selected should the team use its ninth pick. League sources have indicated that Rogers would be the front-runner, but one or more cornerbacks could be gone by the ninth pick. The Redskins could also trade down from the ninth pick or the 25th pick to add more depth to their draft as well. The team currently holds five picks in this weekend's draft, with selections in the fourth round (112), sixth round (183) and seventh round (222) as well. The Redskins could look at linebacker, offensive line and quarterback on the second day of the draft. Redskins Notes: Fans can attend the team's draft-day party at FedEx Field today from 11 a.m.-6 p.m. Coach Joe Gibbs will address the crowd on the field at some point, and players including Ray Brown, Rock Cartwright and Chris Cooley are scheduled to be on hand. . . . Of the 75 players currently on the roster, 16 were drafted by the Redskins, and only six were taken after the third round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruinSkin Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Alright let's get some logic straight here. It would not be 5 players for 1. Why? If we didn't make the Denver trade, we'd have the #9, 3rd round pick, next year's 1st and 4th. That's 4 total picks. We traded 3 picks for the 25. If we were to trade the #9 and #25 for the #2, that would equal us trading the #9, 3rd, 1st, and 4th for the #2. That's 4 picks for 1. A total of 5 picks in the end but NOT 5 players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 OK, so how many of us thought Mike Ditka was a dumbass when he did virtually the same thing to get Ricky "Up in Smoke" Williams? C'mon, I know you're out there. Raise your hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunPortisRun Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 I betting we trade up from #9 to #6. Lebron = next Magic Jonhnson RunPortisRun = Next Andyman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Another story. http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/11466425.htm Dolphins discussing trade possibilities with No. 2 overall pick BY ARMANDO SALGUERO AND JASON COLE Knight Ridder Newspapers MIAMI - (KRT) - Nick Saban's first Dolphins draft might offer a boon of picks or talent. Or both. The Dolphins could find themselves in position to trade the second overall pick on Saturday for multiple picks - a palatable possibility for a team that must address several roster voids and hopes to rebound from a 4-12 record. The Washington Redskins, who hold the ninth and 25th picks, seem to be Miami's most likely trade partner, but the Dolphins also have discussed trade parameters with Tampa Bay and Minnesota. The Cleveland Browns, who hold the third pick, also joined the trade talks with Miami in recent days. Every team Miami talked to reportedly wants one of two players: Michigan receiver Braylon Edwards or Utah quarterback Alex Smith. The Redskins are so focused on Edwards that the player's representative, Peter Schaffer, confirmed Friday that Washington called to set up a meeting to talk about Edwards. That meeting was supposed to happen in the evening and possibly include contract discussions. Although the Redskins might not have the necessary equity in their two first-round picks to acquire Miami's No. 2 pick, it is possible they can also trade receiver Rod Gardner, a four-year starter and former first-round selection. The Dolphins likely won't decide whether to trade down or use their pick until sometime around 12:17 p.m. today, when they get 15 minutes on the draft clock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 This would be bad...actually my worst nightmare. I pray that this not the plan. We need more quality players on the team, not another prima donna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Well, which is it Jason? Are the Redskins 'well-positioned', or are they 'poised'. Theres a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoDannyBoy Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 I would be happier taking Chris Spencer or David Baas at 25 and using the nine on CB than taking Edwards. Another WR isn't going to help if the line can't hold up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdavis2005 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 If this goes through, it is a stupid move. We don't have any money to give to Pierce or Smoot but we have millions of dollars as well as multiple draft picks to give to unproven receivers. Paying Moss and Edwards both 25+ million sucks!!! Not to mention the 9 million hit for trading Coles. If we were going to invest this much money into the position why not go out and get Randy Moss, he would of still probably commanded 2 first rounders but at least you're getting a legit superstar. Nothing against Edwards but to give away 4 picks plus Gardner is too much for any player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sealskin Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Ok, this would kind of suck. I find it hard to believe we would go out and get two receivers in free agency; then turn around and draft Edwards. We should stand pat and hope Williams falls to us. Williams may be alot like Keyshaun physically but is that a bad thing? I dont like Johnson but he is a very good possession receiver (just what we need). It would be too much to give up to move up and get Edwards. Receiver and tackle are the two positions too risky to make this type of deal. There really is no sure thing. Edwards is talented but I would prefer Mike over him. If Williams is taken before us I hope we take Rogers and Miller. Miller may not be Gonzalez but he reminds me of dallas tightend (name escapes me, from Tennessee). Miller and Cooley would open up the middle of the field for Ramsey and provide a good safety valve for him. Moss, Patten and Jacobs can stretch the field. New England, Indianapolis and Philthy used two tightend sets with good results last year. This would also open up the play action and stop the eight man fronts Portis had too deal with so much. Our O-line if healthy is solid right now with decent depth. Williams or Miller would be the better options in my opion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 If we want to trade up we can still get a deal done with either Tennessee or Tampa and still have a 2nd round pick. I dont see why we need to go all the way to #1 or #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Originally posted by RunPortisRun I betting we trade up from #9 to #6. Lebron = next Magic Jonhnson RunPortisRun = Next Andyman dont toot your horn too much, ive been putting out this senario for a few weeks now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard saunders Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 Originally posted by Park City Skins By Jason La Canfora Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, April 23, 2005; Page D01 If Washington were to deal those two picks to move up, it would be parting with five total draft picks -- including three first-rounders -- over two trades in order to land the player. The Redskins have not drafted a star receiver since taking Art Monk in the first round in 1980. He's right, we haven't drafted a star wide receiver since Art Monk. But, no one can know for sure that Edwards will be either. Sometimes I feel like they're going back and forth....one side telling us it would be a boneheaded move, and the other side baiting us with these kind of comments. Either way they'll bash us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.